133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11662163)
1. Guilt by physiology: the constitutionality of tests to determine predisposition to violent behavior.
Brown PN
South Calif Law Rev; 1974 Nov; 48(2):489-570. PubMed ID: 11662163
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. AIDS and the coercive power of the state.
Sullivan KM; Field MA
Harv Civ Rights-Civil Lib Law Rev; 1988; 23(1):139-97. PubMed ID: 11658994
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Judicial decisions in civil commitment: facts, attitudes, and psychiatric recommendations.
Hiday VA
Law Soc Rev; 1983; 17(3):517-30. PubMed ID: 11658694
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Parens patriae "treatment": legal punishment in disguise.
Coleman L; Solomon T
Hastings Constit Law Q; 1976; 3(2):345-62. PubMed ID: 11664728
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Futurity and permissibility of genetic engineering: the legal challenges.
Westra J
Ohio North Univ Law Rev; 1974; 1(3):499-509. PubMed ID: 11662950
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Pots and black kettles: a philosopher's perspective on psychosurgery.
Neville R
Boston Univ Law Rev; 1974 Mar; 54(2):340-53. PubMed ID: 11661089
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Due process limitations on parental rights to commit children to mental institutions.
Holladay JN
Univ Colo Law Rev; 1977; 48(2):235-66. PubMed ID: 11664712
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Controlling the epidemic: the Texas AIDS reporting statute.
Edwards J
Bayl Law Rev; 1989; 41(2):399-428. PubMed ID: 11659231
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Hospitalization for tuberculosis: ensure due process for persons involuntarily hospitalized.
Bessho DM
Ga State Univ Law Rev; 1995 Oct; 12(1):247-51. PubMed ID: 11657399
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The constitutionality of the use of the Norplant contraceptive device as a condition of probation.
Burke M
Hastings Constit Law Q; 1992; 20(1):207-46. PubMed ID: 11652186
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Psychosurgery and the involuntarily confined.
Kopesky JP
Villanova Law Rev; 1979 Sep; 24(5-6):949-91. PubMed ID: 11665098
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Psychosurgery: the rights of patients.
Plamondon AL
Loyola Law Rev; 1977; 23(4):1007-28. PubMed ID: 11664912
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The right to refuse treatment: mental patients and the law.
Wade MD
Detroit Coll Law Rev; 1976; 1976(1):53-81. PubMed ID: 11664700
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Forced administration of sex-drive reducing medications to sex offenders: treatment or punishment?
Miller RD
Psychol Public Policy Law; 1998; 4(1-2):175-99. PubMed ID: 12484316
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The constitutionality of mandatory genetic screening statutes.
Adelman CS
Case West Reserve Law Rev; 1981; 31(4):897-948. PubMed ID: 11652405
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Involuntary psychiatric commitments to prevent suicide.
Greenberg DF
N Y Univ Law Rev; 1974; 49(2-3):227-69. PubMed ID: 11664554
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Behavior modification: toward the understanding and reform of federal policy.
DiGiacomo RE
Correct Soc Psych J Behav Tech Methods Ther; 1977; 23(4):101-10. PubMed ID: 11662423
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The constitutionality of involuntary civil commitment of opiate addicts.
Rosenthal MP
J Drug Issues; 1988; 18(4):641-61. PubMed ID: 11650858
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Eugenics and the law's obligation to man.
Weigel CL; Tinkler SE
South Tex Law J; 1973; 14(3):361-91. PubMed ID: 11664216
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Civil commitment under the federal Narcotic Addict Rehabilitation Act.
Lindblad R
J Drug Issues; 1988; 18(4):595-624. PubMed ID: 11650857
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
