These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Quinlan, privacy, and the handling of incompetent dying patients. Cantor NL Rutgers Law Rev; 1977; 30(2):243-266. PubMed ID: 11661461 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The Quinlan decision. Lyons C Christ Crisis; 1976 May; 36(8):103-4. PubMed ID: 11661438 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Therefore choose death? Appelbaum PS; Klein JI Commentary; 1986 Apr; 81(4):23-9. PubMed ID: 11658682 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Euthanasia, the right to die and privacy: observations on some recent cases. Riga PJ Linc Law Rev; 1980; 11(2):109-65. PubMed ID: 11658630 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Euthanasia and law reform. Samek R Ottawa Law Rev; 1984; 17(1):86-115. PubMed ID: 11649198 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The "small beginnings" of euthanasia: examining the erosion in legal prohibitions against mercy-killing. Koop CE; Grant ER Notre Dame J Law Ethics Public Policy; 1986; 2(3):585-634. PubMed ID: 11650885 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Court grants guardianship to father in Quinlan case. Ryser J Am Med News; 1976 Apr; 19(15):13+. PubMed ID: 11661315 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The Quinlan decision. Steinfels P Commonweal; 1975 Dec; 102(19):584+. PubMed ID: 11662227 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Maine's living will act and the termination of life-sustaining medical procedures. Herlan ER Maine Law Rev; 1987; 39(1):83-148. PubMed ID: 11652533 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. In the shadow of Karen Quinlan. Bennett SA Trial; 1976 Sep; 12(9):36-41. PubMed ID: 11664653 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Family surrogate laws: a necessary supplement to living wills and durable powers of attorney. Hamann AA Villanova Law Rev; 1993; 38(1):103-77. PubMed ID: 11654083 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Decisions not to treat: the Saikewicz case and its aftermath. Glantz LH; Swazey JP Bull Am Coll Physicians; 1979 Jan; 2(1):22-32. PubMed ID: 11661768 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The legal logic of euthanasia. Uhlmann MM First Things; 1996; 64():39-43. PubMed ID: 11654467 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Natural death: an alternative in New Jersey. Levant S Georgetown Law J; 1985 Jun; 73(5):1331-54. PubMed ID: 11651811 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. In re Quinlan: a practical overview. Coburn DR Ark Law Rev; 1977; 31(1):59-74. PubMed ID: 11662409 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The right to die (II). Koop CE Hum Life Rev; 1976; 2(2):33-58. PubMed ID: 11662995 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. No-code orders vs. resuscitation: the decision to withhold life-prolonging treatment from the terminally ill. Allan SM Wayne Law Rev; 1979 Nov; 26(1):139-72. PubMed ID: 11661826 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]