These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
266 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11662235)
1. Rights of involuntarily committed mental patients--freedom or treatment? Howard SW Univ San Fernando Valley Law Review; 1975; 4(2):277-87. PubMed ID: 11662235 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Constitutional law--due process--involuntarily civilly committed mental patients have a constitutional right to treatment. Johnson RM; Wehrle-Einhorn RJ Univ Kans Law Rev; 1974; 23(1):188-205. PubMed ID: 11664536 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Developments in the law: civil commitment of the mentally ill. Harv Law Rev; 1974 Apr; 87(6):1190-406. PubMed ID: 11664523 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Judicial schizophrenia: an involuntarily confined mental patient's right to refuse antipsychotic drugs. Cort RS UMKC Law Rev; 1982; 51(1):74-106. PubMed ID: 11658656 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. A model state law on civil commitment of the mentally ill. Stromberg CD; Stone AA Harvard J Legis; 1983; 20(2):275-396. PubMed ID: 11658832 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Involuntary civil commitment: the right to treatment and the right to refuse treatment. Roth LH Psychiatr Ann; 1977 May; 7(5):50-51+. PubMed ID: 11664817 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Treating the mentally disordered offender: society's uncertain, conflicted, and changing views. Hafemeister TL; Petrila J Fla State Univ Law Rev; 1994; 21(3):729-871. PubMed ID: 11660258 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The right to refuse treatment: mental patients and the law. Wade MD Detroit Coll Law Rev; 1976; 1976(1):53-81. PubMed ID: 11664700 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. o'Connor v. Donaldson: due process rights of mental patients in state hospitals. Anderson K Rev Law Soc Change; 1976; 6(1):65-82. PubMed ID: 11664777 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Forced drug medication of involuntarily committed mental patients. Blais NR St Louis Univ Law J; 1975; 20(1):100-19. PubMed ID: 11664646 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. A review of the Burger Court: Part I. Parry J Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1984; 8(6):502-8. PubMed ID: 11658589 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Civil commitment and the right to treatment. Kelly DS LA Law Rev; 1975; 35(2):563-9. PubMed ID: 11664468 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Constitutional law--right to liberty--involuntary confinement of mental patients. Tenn Law Rev; 1976; 43(2):366-73. PubMed ID: 11664691 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Donaldson, dangerousness, and the right to treatment. Grant GM Hastings Constit Law Q; 1976; 3(2):599-627. PubMed ID: 11664729 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Civil rights and the mentally ill: revolution in bedlam. Offir CW Psychol Today; 1974 Oct; 8(5):60-62+. PubMed ID: 11664431 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The Eighth Amendment right to treatment for involuntarily committed mental patients. Iowa Law Rev; 1976 Apr; 61(4):1057-79. PubMed ID: 11664638 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The new Ohio Mental Health Act. Gui J; Bradin SS; Lavin JJ Akron Law Rev; 1977; 11(1):104-81. PubMed ID: 11665001 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The constitutional right to treatment for involuntarily committed mental patients--what limitations? Gaitas GA Washburn Law J; 1975; 14(2):291-308. PubMed ID: 11664474 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Involuntary commitment: the move toward dangerousness. Weissbourd R John Marshall Law Rev; 1982; 15(1):83-113. PubMed ID: 11658335 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]