These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11662253)
1. "In the matter of Karen Quinlan"--a comment. Cantor NL Bioscience; 1976 Apr; 26(4):257-9. PubMed ID: 11662253 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. In the Matter of Karen Quinlan. 31 Mar 1976. New Jersey. Supreme Court Atl Report; 1976; 355():647-72. PubMed ID: 11646053 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. In the Matter of Karen Quinlan. 10 Nov 1975. New Jersey. Superior Court, Chancery Division Atl Report; 1975; 348():801-24. PubMed ID: 11645911 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The legal aspects of the right to die: before and after the Quinlan decision. Becker D; Fleming R; Overstreet R KY Law J; 1977; 65(4):823-79. PubMed ID: 11661533 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Decisionmaking in authorizing and withholding life sustaining medical treatment: from Quinlan to Cruzan. Keilitz I; Bilzor JC; Hafemeister TL; Brown V; Dudyshyn D Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1989; 13(5):482-93. PubMed ID: 11654759 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Withholding life-prolonging medical treatment from the institutionalized person--who decides? Corbett KA; Raciti RM New Engl J Prison Law; 1976; 3(1):47-83. PubMed ID: 11664738 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. John F. Kennedy Memorial Hospital, Inc. v. Bludworth. Paulus SM Issues Law Med; 1985 Sep; 1(2):163-6. PubMed ID: 11643875 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. In the shadow of Karen Quinlan. Bennett SA Trial; 1976 Sep; 12(9):36-41. PubMed ID: 11664653 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. In re Storar: the right to die and incompetent patients. Colabrese CA Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1982; 43(4):1087-107. PubMed ID: 11658613 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. A hypothetical: Quinlan under Ohio law. Gerzog WC Akron Law Rev; 1976; 10(1):145-69. PubMed ID: 11664693 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Withholding food and water from a patient--should it be condoned in California? Harber SM Pac Law J; 1985 Apr; 16(3):877-93. PubMed ID: 11652432 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Who should decide? The case of Karen Quinlan. Gaylin We Christ Crisis; 1976 Jan; 35(22):322-31. PubMed ID: 11664703 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Medico-legal implications of "orders not to resuscitate. Tecklenburg N Cathol Univers Law Rev; 1982; 31(3):515-37. PubMed ID: 11649468 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Therefore, choose death. Brown ML Human Rights; 1982; 10(3):38-45. PubMed ID: 11651709 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Karen's right to die. Hamilton MP Christ Century; 1976 Apr; 92(15):404-5. PubMed ID: 11664609 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The right to a natural death. Csank JF Hum Life Rev; 1978; 4(1):44-54. PubMed ID: 11661546 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. In re Quinlan: one step further. Ek GK Houst Law Rev; 1987 Mar; 24(2):383-98. PubMed ID: 11649893 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Substituted judgment in medical decision making for incompetent persons: In re Storar. Williams SE Wis L Rev; 1982; 1982(6):1173-98. PubMed ID: 11651834 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. In re Quinlan: a practical overview. Coburn DR Ark Law Rev; 1977; 31(1):59-74. PubMed ID: 11662409 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Medical decisionmaking for the incompetent person: a comprehensive approach. Marzen TJ Issues Law Med; 1986 Jan; 1(4):293-317. PubMed ID: 11651815 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]