436 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11662296)
21. Mental disabilities law issues.
Epstein JM
Colo Lawyer; 1977 Dec; 6(12):2163-8. PubMed ID: 11663038
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Treatment rights of mentally ill nursing home residents.
Barnett CF
Univ PA Law Rev; 1978 Jan; 126(3):578-629. PubMed ID: 11664875
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Mental health and developmental disabilities code.
Illinois
Smith-Hurd Ill Annot Statut Ill; 1983-1984; ChaPter 91.1.2 Sections 1.100 to 6.107(Suppl):. PubMed ID: 12043648
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Behind the institutional wall.
Friedman PR
Trial; 1975; 11(6):29-31. PubMed ID: 11662206
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. The right of the mentally ill to receive treatment in the community.
Rapson R
Columbia J Law Soc Probl; 1980; 16(2):193-268. PubMed ID: 11665276
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Pennsylvania's new Mental Health Procedures Act: due process and the right to treatment for the mentally ill.
Lundeen PA
Dickinson Law Rev; 1977; 81(3):627-47. PubMed ID: 11664828
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Guaranteeing the right to treatment.
Hoffman PB; Dunn RC
Psychiatr Ann; 1976 Jun; 6(6):7-11+. PubMed ID: 11662297
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. The "right to treatment": can the courts rehabilitate and cure?
Miller HL
Public Interest; 1977; (46):. PubMed ID: 11664773
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Missouri's new mental health act: the problems with progress.
Staulcup VH
Wash Univ Law Q; 1979; 1979(1):209-33. PubMed ID: 11665135
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. A search for the missing premise of involuntary therapeutic commitment: effective treatment of the mentally ill.
Durham ML; La Fond JQ
Rutgers Law Rev; 1988; 40(2):303-68. PubMed ID: 11659035
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. The right to refuse treatment in New Jersey.
Perlin ML
Psychiatr Ann; 1976 Jun; 6(6):90-92+. PubMed ID: 11662299
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Involuntary commitment of the mentally ill.
Troland MB
Mont Law Rev; 1977; 38(2):307-25. PubMed ID: 11664835
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. The Supreme Court sidesteps the right to treatment question.
Univ Colo Law Rev; 1976; 47(2):299-323. PubMed ID: 11664633
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Donaldson, dangerousness, and the right to treatment.
Grant GM
Hastings Constit Law Q; 1976; 3(2):599-627. PubMed ID: 11664729
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. The treatment of mentally ill persons law, 5751-1991. Dated 4 December 1990. (Sefer Ha-Chukkim, 8 January 1991, No. 1339, pp. 56-58).
Israel
Int Dig Health Legis; 1992; 43(4):. PubMed ID: 11659642
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Compelling treatment in the community: distorted doctrines and violated values.
Schwartz SJ; Costanzo CE
Loyola Los Angel Law Rev; 1987 Jun; 20(4):1329-429. PubMed ID: 11658983
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Least restrictive treatment of involuntary patients: translating concepts into practice.
Keilitz I; Conn D; Giampetro A
St Louis Univ Law J; 1985; 29(3):691-745. PubMed ID: 11649207
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Special section on APA's model commitment law: an introduction Key provision of APA's model law.
Appelbaum PS
Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1985 Sep; 36(9):966-8. PubMed ID: 11643844
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Post-Parham remedies: the involuntary commitment of minors in Virginia after Parham v. J.R.
Spaulding WJ
Univ Richmond Law Rev; 1979; 13(4):695-741. PubMed ID: 11665159
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Beyond Rouse and Wyatt: an administrative law model for expanding and implementing the mental patient's right to treatment.
Hoffman PB; Dunn RC
Va Law Rev; 1975 Mar; 61(2):297-340. PubMed ID: 11664472
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
