These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
436 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11662296)
41. The civil commitment process for juveniles: an empirical study. Stone DH Univ Detroit Law Rev; 1988; 65(4):679-721. PubMed ID: 11659124 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. The empirical consequences and policy implications of broadening the statutory criteria for civil commitment. Durham ML; La Fond JQ Yale Law Policy Rev; 1985; 3(2):395-446. PubMed ID: 11652469 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. Constitutional requirements in the commitment of the mentally ill in the U.S.A.: rights to liberty and therapy. Flaschner FN Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 1974; 18(3):283-301. PubMed ID: 11664409 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. Institutionalizing the rights of mental patients: committing the legislature. Morris GH Calif Law Rev; 1974 May; 62(3):957-1024. PubMed ID: 11663464 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. A constitutional analysis of involuntary civil commitment in Wyoming. Keiter RB Land Water Law Rev; 1980; 15(1):141-206. PubMed ID: 11665248 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. Medicating committed psychiatric patients over their objections: balancing patients' interests and quality of mental health care. Hacker G Rutgers Law J; 1983; 14(3):685-739. PubMed ID: 11658759 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. Constitutional law--due process--involuntarily civilly committed mental patients have a constitutional right to treatment. Johnson RM; Wehrle-Einhorn RJ Univ Kans Law Rev; 1974; 23(1):188-205. PubMed ID: 11664536 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. A constitutional right to treatment: past, present, and future. Wallach S Prof Psychol; 1976 Nov; 7(4):453-67. PubMed ID: 11664666 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. Progress in involuntary commitment. Campbell RE Wash Law Rev; 1974 Feb; 49(2):617-46. PubMed ID: 11664399 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. Law of 2 July 1992 of the Russian Federation on psychiatric care and the safeguarding of citizens' rights in the dispensing of such care. Russian Federation Int Dig Health Legis; 1993; 44(2):267-81. PubMed ID: 11655198 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. Standards for involuntary civil commitment in Pennsylvania. Meyers BA Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1977; 38(3):535-49. PubMed ID: 11663030 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. Civil commitment and the right to treatment. Kelly DS LA Law Rev; 1975; 35(2):563-9. PubMed ID: 11664468 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. o'Connor v. Donaldson: due process and the involuntarily civilly committed mental patient. Wold SM Tulsa Law J; 1976; 11(4):604-14. PubMed ID: 11664640 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. The right to treatment for mentally ill juveniles in California. Lovell JE Hastings Law J; 1976 Mar; 27(4):865-93. PubMed ID: 11664617 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. Judicial implementation and Wyatt v. Stickney. Drake J Ala Law Rev; 1981; 32(2):299-312. PubMed ID: 11650546 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. Civil commitment of the mentally ill: Lessard v. Schmidt. Landis AH De Paul Law Rev; 1974; 23(3):1276-97. PubMed ID: 11664582 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. Judicially-ordered involuntary treatment of the mentally ill. Sullivan JL J Mo Bar; 1975 Jun; 31():254-8. PubMed ID: 11664534 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]