These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11662326)
1. Roe v. Wade: some definitional considerations. Nolan-Haley JM; Hilgers TW Hum Life Rev; 1977; 3(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 11662326 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Overruling Roe v. Wade: an analysis of the proposed Constitutional amendments. Rice CE Boston Coll Ind Commer Law Rev; 1973 Dec; 15(2):307-41. PubMed ID: 11663416 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Roe v. Wade and the traditional legal standards concerning pregnancy. Hopkin WR Temple Law Q; 1974; 47(4):715-38. PubMed ID: 11664349 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Killing "the handicapped" -- before and after birth. Field MA Harv Womens Law J; 1993; 16():79-138. PubMed ID: 11652872 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The forest and the trees: Roe v. Wade and its critics. Heymann PB; Barzelay DE Boston Univ Law Rev; 1973 Jul; 53(4):765-84. PubMed ID: 11663362 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. A decision-theoretic reconstruction of Roe v. Wade. Lockhart T Public Aff Q; 1991 Jul; 5(3):243-58. PubMed ID: 11656064 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Rethinking Roe v. Wade. Wardle LD Brigh Young Univ Law Rev; 1985; 1985(2):231-64. PubMed ID: 11655792 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The Supreme Court 1972 term. Foreward: toward a model of roles in the due process of life and law. Tribe LH Harv Law Rev; 1973 Nov; 87(1):1-53. PubMed ID: 11663596 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Medical responsibility for fetal survival under Roe and Doe. Sendor BB Harv Civ Rights-Civil Lib Law Rev; 1975; 10(2):444-71. PubMed ID: 11663614 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Abortion and the Constitution: the need for a life-protective amendment. Destro RA Calif Law Rev; 1975 Sep; 63(5):1250-351. PubMed ID: 11663611 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. State protection of the viable unborn child after Roe v. Wade: how little, how late? Rees G LA Law Rev; 1976; 37(1):270-82. PubMed ID: 11663713 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Trimesters and technology: revamping Roe v. Wade. Rhoden NK Yale Law J; 1986 Mar; 95(4):639-97. PubMed ID: 11655828 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Prenatal caretaking: limits of state intervention with and without Roe. Rush SE Univ Fla Law Rev; 1987; 39(1):55-112. PubMed ID: 11658954 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Abortions and infanticide: America's movement away from human rights. Andrusko D Lincoln Rev; 1985; 5(3):31-9. PubMed ID: 11655734 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Oh my God, I'm pregnant. Minter CV Ohio North Univ Law Rev; 1973; 1(1):119-29. PubMed ID: 11663469 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Revisiting Roe v. Wade: substance and process in the abortion debate. Farrell MG Indiana Law J; 1993; 68(2):269-362. PubMed ID: 11656341 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. "Social abortion" pre and post Webster. Bannon AE; Nigro SA State Health Legis Rep; 1989 Dec; 17(4):9-19. PubMed ID: 11655955 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The new pro-life legislation: patterns and recommendations. Witherspoon JP St Marys Law J; 1976; 7(4):637-97. PubMed ID: 11664635 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Whose right to life? Implications of Roe v. Wade. Cane MB Fam Law Q; 1973; 7(4):413-32. PubMed ID: 11663407 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Delivery room resuscitation of the high-risk infant: a conflict of rights. Cooper R Cathol Lawyer; 1990; 33(4):325-60. PubMed ID: 11659422 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]