These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11662391)
1. Biologists oppose DNA research bills. Sci News; 1977 Jul; 112(3):36-7. PubMed ID: 11662391 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Should science be stopped? The case of recombinant DNA research. Gershon ES Public Interest; 1983; No. 71():3-16. PubMed ID: 11650689 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Risks and benefits, rights and responsibilities: a history of the recombinant DNA research controversy. Swazey JP; Sorenson JR; Wong CB South Calif Law Rev; 1978 Sep; 51(6):1019-78. PubMed ID: 11661650 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Recombinant DNA forum--stellar cast; gripping plot; but no new message. Leeper EM Bioscience; 1977 May; 27(5):317-9. PubMed ID: 11662385 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Recombinant DNA: a case study in regulation of scientific research. Chalfant JC; Hartmann ME; Blakeboro A Ecol Law Q; 1979; 8(1):55-129. PubMed ID: 11665069 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Recombinant DNA and the regulation of biotechnology: reflections on the Asilomar Conference, ten years after. Barkstrom JE Akron Law Rev; 1985; 19(1):81-126. PubMed ID: 11650740 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Playing God with DNA. Lubow A New Times; 1977 Jan; 8(1):48-49+. PubMed ID: 11661390 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Tinkering with life. Time; 1977 Apr; 109(16):32-34+. PubMed ID: 11661472 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Tempest in a test tube. Mays B Stud Lawyer; 1981 Mar; 9(7):26-28+. PubMed ID: 11662901 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Scientists' debate over study of recombinant DNA enters the public arena. Ryser J Am Med News; 1976 Aug; 19(31):13-4. PubMed ID: 11661346 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Scientists now downplay risks of genetic research. Cohn V Washington Post; 1977 Jul; ():A1+. PubMed ID: 11648840 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The DNA maelstrom. McCann NL Sojourners; 1977 May; 6(5):23-6. PubMed ID: 11662888 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Who should control recombinant DNA? Fields CM Chron High Educ; 1977 Mar; 14(4):1+. PubMed ID: 11661400 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Recombinant DNA pioneers lower the alarm. Norman C Sci Gov Rep; 1977 Jul; 7(12):1-3. PubMed ID: 11661486 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Scientists ask Congress to control DNA research. Leeper EM Bioscience; 1977 Feb; 27(2):141-3. PubMed ID: 11661597 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The nucleus family. Blumenthal S Stud Lawyer; 1978 Sep; 7(1):24-27+. PubMed ID: 11662505 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Government regulation of the pursuit of knowledge: the recombinant DNA controversy. Berger RG Vt Law Rev; 1978; 3():83-110. PubMed ID: 11662474 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Fruits of gene-juggling: blessing or curse? Med World News; 1976 Oct; 17(21):45+. PubMed ID: 11661341 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. DNA and the congressional prerogatives: proposals for a deliberate legislative approach to genetic research. English TL Indiana Law J; 1978; 53(3):571-84. PubMed ID: 11661591 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]