These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Should science be stopped? The case of recombinant DNA research. Gershon ES Public Interest; 1983; No. 71():3-16. PubMed ID: 11650689 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Risks and benefits, rights and responsibilities: a history of the recombinant DNA research controversy. Swazey JP; Sorenson JR; Wong CB South Calif Law Rev; 1978 Sep; 51(6):1019-78. PubMed ID: 11661650 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Recombinant DNA and the regulation of biotechnology: reflections on the Asilomar Conference, ten years after. Barkstrom JE Akron Law Rev; 1985; 19(1):81-126. PubMed ID: 11650740 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Scientists' backlash against US legislation on DNA. Lewin R New Sci; 1977 Jun; 74(1057):692. PubMed ID: 11663773 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Recombinant DNA: a case study in regulation of scientific research. Chalfant JC; Hartmann ME; Blakeboro A Ecol Law Q; 1979; 8(1):55-129. PubMed ID: 11665069 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Recombinant DNA pioneers lower the alarm. Norman C Sci Gov Rep; 1977 Jul; 7(12):1-3. PubMed ID: 11661486 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Congress and the right of research. Wade N Civ Liberties Rev; 1978; 4(6):59-61. PubMed ID: 11662657 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. DNA and the congressional prerogatives: proposals for a deliberate legislative approach to genetic research. English TL Indiana Law J; 1978; 53(3):571-84. PubMed ID: 11661591 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]