These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11662573)

  • 1. Carey, kids and contraceptives: privacy's problem child.
    Warner RE
    Univ Miami Law Rev; 1978 Jun; 32(3):750-62. PubMed ID: 11662573
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sexuality, privacy and the new biology.
    Smith GP; Iraola R
    Marquette Law Rev; 1984; 67(2):263-91. PubMed ID: 11658703
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Privacy and contraception in the American and Irish constitutions.
    Burt RA
    St Louis Univ Public Law Rev; 1988; 7(2):287-96. PubMed ID: 11659154
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sexual privacy: access of a minor to contraceptives, abortion, and sterilization without parental consent.
    Henenberg K
    Univ Richmond Law Rev; 1977; 12(1):221-44. PubMed ID: 11664910
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The right to privacy expanded: state infringements upon decisions affecting contraception subjected to strict scrutiny.
    Kelly KS
    Loyola Law Rev; 1978; 24(1):149-63. PubMed ID: 11663903
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Carey v. Population Services International: an extension of the right of privacy.
    Benson DE
    Ohio North Univ Law Rev; 1978 Jan; 5(1):167-74. PubMed ID: 11662614
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Constitutional law--minors' access to contraceptives--the right to privacy, due process and the First Amendment.
    Levine BL
    NY Law Sch Law Rev; 1978; 23(4):777-90. PubMed ID: 11662585
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Juvenile privacy: a minor's right of access to contraceptives.
    D'Ammora VJ
    Fordham Urban Law J; 1978; 6(2):371-87. PubMed ID: 11664961
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The law and legal impact of contraceptive use by minors in North Carolina.
    Wright DM
    North Carol Centr Law J; 1975; 6(2):304-13. PubMed ID: 11664471
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. carey v. Population Services International: closing the curtain on Comstockery.
    Dubin AG
    Brooklyn Law Rev; 1978; 44(3):565-97. PubMed ID: 11664966
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Whither the family and family privacy?
    Jones TR; Peterman L
    Tex Rev Law Polit; 1999; 4(1):193-236. PubMed ID: 15706723
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The husband's rights in abortion.
    Etzioni A
    Trial; 1976 Nov; 12(11):56-8. PubMed ID: 11664680
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Parental notification as a prerequisite for minors' access to contraceptives: a behavioral and legal analysis.
    Finger MN
    Univ Mich J Law Reform; 1979; 13(1):196-223. PubMed ID: 11665130
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Constitutional law--a state cannot...abridge privacy rights of minors under sixteen by denying them access to nonprescription contraceptives.
    Gall-Clayton N
    J Fam Law; 1978 Apr; 16(3):639-52. PubMed ID: 11662617
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Roe v. Wade: what rights the biological father?
    Georgius EH
    Hastings Constit Law Q; 1974; 1(1):251-72. PubMed ID: 11664368
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Constitutional law: minors' access to contraceptives--freed from future restraints?
    Hoyt EE
    Univ Fla Law Rev; 1977; 29(5):1019-29. PubMed ID: 11664911
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Carey v. Population Services International. 9 Jun 1977.
    U.S. Supreme Court
    U S Rep U S Supreme Court; 1977; 431():678-719. PubMed ID: 12038359
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Constitutional law--abortion--parental and spousal consent requirements violate right to privacy in abortion decision.
    Sanders JE
    Univ Kans Law Rev; 1976; 24(2):446-62. PubMed ID: 11664628
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sterilization: who says no?
    George HE
    Mercer Law Rev; 1978; 29(3):821-39. PubMed ID: 11664923
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The unmarried woman's right to artificial insemination: a call for an expanded definition of family.
    Kritchevsky B
    Harv Womens Law J; 1981; 4(1):1-42. PubMed ID: 11649447
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.