BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11662647)

  • 1. The Indian dilemma--coercive birth control or compulsory pregnancy.
    Black T; Potts M
    Contemp Rev; 1978 Nov; 233(1354):232-6. PubMed ID: 11662647
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. India's compulsory sterilization laws: the human right of family planning.
    Castetter DL
    Calif West Int Law J; 1978; 8(2):342-67. PubMed ID: 11662567
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Compulsory sterilization in India.
    Warwick DP
    Commonweal; 1976 Sep; 103(19):582-5. PubMed ID: 11660901
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Compulsory sterilization.
    India. Maharashtra
    Int Dig Health Legis; 1976; 27(4):779-88. PubMed ID: 11663701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A pastoral letter on sterilization.
    Catholic Bishops of India
    Cathol Mind; 1977 May; 75(1313):4-6. PubMed ID: 11663280
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Compulsory sterilization provokes fear, contempt.
    Simons LM
    Washington Post; 1977 Jul; ():A1+. PubMed ID: 11648839
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The failure of family planning: India turns to sterilization.
    D'Monte D
    New Lead; 1976 May; 59(10):10-2. PubMed ID: 11662316
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fertility policy and implementation in China, 1986-88.
    Hardee-Cleaveland K; Banister J
    Popul Dev Rev; 1988 Jun; 14(2):245-86. PubMed ID: 11651940
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. National population policy: a statement of the government of India.
    Singh K
    Popul Dev Rev; 1976 Jun; 2(2):309-12. PubMed ID: 11663276
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Coerced sterilization under federally funded family planning programs.
    Diamond E
    New Engl Law Rev; 1976; 11(2):589-614. PubMed ID: 11664603
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mass sterilisation at gunpoint.
    Hanlon J; Agarwal A
    New Sci; 1977 May; 74(1050):268-70. PubMed ID: 11663769
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. American global population policy: an ethical analysis.
    Dyck AJ
    Linacre Q; 1975 Feb; 42(1):54-63. PubMed ID: 11661208
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. How can we make fewer children attractive?
    Fremlin JH
    Int J Environ Stud; 1974; 7(1):57-61. PubMed ID: 11661147
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bangladeshis coerced into sterilisation.
    Vines G
    New Sci; 1985 Sep; 107(1474):22-1. PubMed ID: 11655885
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Law and population in India.
    Jorapur PB
    Indian J Soc Work; 1977 Apr; 38(1):61-9. PubMed ID: 11663783
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bullying birth control.
    Warwick DP
    Commonweal; 1975 Sep; 102(13):392-4. PubMed ID: 11660891
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Are disincentives coercive? The view from Singapore.
    Salaff J; Wong AK
    Int Fam Plan Perspect; 1978; 4(2):50-5. PubMed ID: 11662718
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Aspects of female sterilization.
    Bhatia P
    East Anthropol; 1979; 32(2):107-16. PubMed ID: 12261421
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Women's experiences with family planning.
    Gupte M
    Health Millions; 1994 Jun; 2(3):33-6. PubMed ID: 12345778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. India's sterilisation policy.
    Aguiar BM
    Tablet; 1976 Mar; 230(7080):251-2. PubMed ID: 11661353
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.