These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11662693)
1. DNA regulation bill hits roadblock again. Wehr E Congr Q Wkly Rep; 1978 May; 36(21):1331-5. PubMed ID: 11662693 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Recombinant DNA and the regulation of biotechnology: reflections on the Asilomar Conference, ten years after. Barkstrom JE Akron Law Rev; 1985; 19(1):81-126. PubMed ID: 11650740 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Government regulation of the pursuit of knowledge: the recombinant DNA controversy. Berger RG Vt Law Rev; 1978; 3():83-110. PubMed ID: 11662474 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Recombinant DNA forum--stellar cast; gripping plot; but no new message. Leeper EM Bioscience; 1977 May; 27(5):317-9. PubMed ID: 11662385 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Scientists fight Senate DNA bill. Fields CM Chron High Educ; 1977 Aug; 14(21):13. PubMed ID: 11662393 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Dealing with experts: the recombinant DNA debate. Park B; Thacher S Sci People; 1977; 9(5):28-35. PubMed ID: 11662396 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. State biotechnology oversight: the juncture of technology, law, and public policy. Vito CC Maine Law Rev; 1993; 45(2):329-83. PubMed ID: 11652701 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Recombinant DNA bills derailed: Congress still trying to pass a law. Culliton BJ Science; 1978 Jan; 199(4326):274-7. PubMed ID: 11643429 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Congress and the right of research. Wade N Civ Liberties Rev; 1978; 4(6):59-61. PubMed ID: 11662657 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Biotechnology and culture: the impact of public debates on government regulation in the United States and Denmark. Baark E; Jamison A Technol Soc; 1990; 12(1):27-44. PubMed ID: 11650912 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Recombinant DNA research. Skalka AM Res Manage; 1978 Jan; 21(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 11662918 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Recombinant DNA and technology assessment. Georgetown Law J; 1977; 11(4):785-878. PubMed ID: 11664859 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Risks and benefits, rights and responsibilities: a history of the recombinant DNA research controversy. Swazey JP; Sorenson JR; Wong CB South Calif Law Rev; 1978 Sep; 51(6):1019-78. PubMed ID: 11661650 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. An unprecedented debate. Norman C Nature; 1977 Feb; 265(5595):575-7. PubMed ID: 11643373 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Can scientists be trusted on hazardous research? Fields CM Chron High Educ; 1976 Aug; 12(21):4-5. PubMed ID: 11661340 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Scientists' backlash against US legislation on DNA. Lewin R New Sci; 1977 Jun; 74(1057):692. PubMed ID: 11663773 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The DNA maelstrom. McCann NL Sojourners; 1977 May; 6(5):23-6. PubMed ID: 11662888 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Recombinant DNA: triumph or Trojan horse? Holtzman E Man Med; 1977; 2(2):83-103, W7. PubMed ID: 12083131 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Scientists ask Congress to control DNA research. Leeper EM Bioscience; 1977 Feb; 27(2):141-3. PubMed ID: 11661597 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]