286 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11662797)
1. Are living organisms proper subject matter for a patent? United States Supreme Court to decide question of first impression in Parker v. Bergy.
Slade RJ; Van den Broder JM
West State Univ Law Rev; 1979; 7(1):125-131. PubMed ID: 11662797
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The patentability of living organisms under 35 U.S.C. Section 101: Parker v. Bergy (Parker v. Chakrabarty).
Fitzgerald JP
New Engl Law Rev; 1978; 15(2):379-405. PubMed ID: 11662838
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Patent law--patent on life form--man-made modification of microorganism is patentable subject matter under 35 U.S.C. 101--Diamond v. Chakrabarty, 100 S.Ct. 2204 (1980).
Vidas S
Hamline Law Rev; 1981 Jan; 4(2):341-50. PubMed ID: 11650724
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Patent law--man-made, living microorganisms held patentable subject matter under section 101 of the Patent Act--Diamond v. Chakrabarty, 447 U.S. 303 (1980).
Faggen N
Temple Law Q; 1981; 54(2):308-30. PubMed ID: 11652407
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Diamond v. Chakrabarty: living things as statutory subject matter.
James ME
North Ill Univ Law Rev; 1980; 1(1):119-39. PubMed ID: 11650660
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Patentability of micro-organisms: Diamond v. Chakrabarty.
Burns K
Ark Law Rev; 1982; 35(2):313-27. PubMed ID: 11650697
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Patent law--human-made, genetically engineered, living microorganism constitutes a "manufacture" or "composition of matter" under Title 35 U.S.C. Sect. 101--Diamond v. Chakrabarty, 477 U.S. 303 (1980).
Harris RR
Miss Coll Law Rev; 1981 Jan; 2(2):161-73. PubMed ID: 11652412
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Patent law: live, human-made microorganisms are patentable subject matter under 35 U.S.C. Sect. 101--Diamond v. Chakrabarty.
Namei FT
Univ Cincinnati Law Rev; 1980; 49(4):902-13. PubMed ID: 11650489
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Patent law: statutory subject matter--genetically engineered microorganisms.
Valentine VV
Tenn Law Rev; 1981; 48(2):454-74. PubMed ID: 11650494
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. New life in US patents: the Chakrabarty case.
Daus DG
Eur Intellect Prop Rev; 1981 Jul; 3(7):194-200. PubMed ID: 11650711
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Diamond v. Chakrabarty: scientist patents micro-organism--life forms considered patentable subject matter.
Kiernan JM
Ohio North Univ Law Rev; 1980 Oct; 7(4):1038-51. PubMed ID: 11650472
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Patent law: patentability of micro-organisms.
Brennan AA
Akron Law Rev; 1980; 14(2):341-9. PubMed ID: 11650627
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Microorganism patents.
Behringer JW
J Pat Off Soc; 1981 Mar; 63(3):128-37. PubMed ID: 11650632
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Live, human-made bacteria as patentable subject matter under 35 U.S.C. 101: Diamond v. Chakrabarty.
Jensen BJ
Brigh Young Univ Law Rev; 1980; 1980(3):705-19. PubMed ID: 11650474
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. An international comparative analysis of the patentability of recombinant DNA-derived organisms.
Sparrow CN
Univ Toledo Law Rev; 1981; 12(4):945-57. PubMed ID: 11649594
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Patents--patentable subject matter--living man-made organisms held to be patentable subject matter under 35 U.S.C. Section 101.
Day MT
Marquette Law Rev; 1980; 63(4):711-30. PubMed ID: 11662894
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Patents--a live man-made micro-organism is patentable subject matter under 35 U.S.C. Section 101.
Fowler CF
Drake Law Rev; 1980-1981; 30(3):635-49. PubMed ID: 11650556
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. New criteria for patentable subject matter: microorganisms and computer-related technology.
Greenlee LL
Brooklyn Law Rev; 1980; 47(1):43-66. PubMed ID: 11650569
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The patentability of living matter: Hey waiter, what's Chakrabarty's pseudomonas bacterium doing back in the Supreme Court's soup?
Rayson GS
Wash Lee Law Rev; 1980; 37(1):183-200. PubMed ID: 11662809
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Building a better bacterium: genetic engineering and the patent law after Diamond v. Chakrabarty.
Krueger KG
Columbia Law Rev; 1981 Jan; 81(1):159-78. PubMed ID: 11650475
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
