These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11662840)

  • 21. Rutherford v. United States. 10 Jul 1978.
    U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit
    Fed Report; 1978; 582():1234-7. PubMed ID: 11645930
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. High court ducks two issues, leaving Laetrile unchecked.
    Med World News; 1979 Jul; 20(14):17+. PubMed ID: 11645407
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The judicial dilemma of Laetrile and a possible solution.
    Pendergast WR
    Mercer Law Rev; 1979; 30(3):573-84. PubMed ID: 11661827
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. U.S. Laetrile ban backed.
    Mintz M
    Washington Post; 1979 Jun; ():A1+. PubMed ID: 11648764
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Picking your poison: the drug efficacy requirement and the right of privacy.
    Rushing DG
    UCLA Law Rev; 1978 Feb; 25(3):577-617. PubMed ID: 11663959
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The Laetrile controversy: background and issues.
    Eddy CH
    Ariz Law Rev; 1978; 20(3):825-60. PubMed ID: 11662772
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Governmental regulation of heart transplantation and the right to privacy.
    Merriken K; Overcast TD
    J Contemp Law; 1985; 11(2):481-514. PubMed ID: 11656659
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. People v. Privitera: the right to prescribe and use Laetrile.
    Brandt EK
    West State Univ Law Rev; 1978; 5(2):201-229. PubMed ID: 11661590
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Regulating Laetrile: constitutional and statutory implications.
    Patton-Hulce VR
    Univ Dayton Law Rev; 1980; 5(1):155-76. PubMed ID: 11661910
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Assisted suicide and reproductive freedom: exploring some connections.
    Appleton SF
    Wash Univ Law Q; 1998; 76(1):15-36. PubMed ID: 11657576
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Rutherford v. United States. 4 Jan 1977.
    U.S. District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
    Fed Suppl; 1977; 424():105-8. PubMed ID: 11645918
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Laetrile, the continuing controversy.
    Carbone A
    Hosp Formul; 1978 Aug; 13(8):589-91. PubMed ID: 11645661
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Supreme humility.
    McConnell MW
    Wall St J (East Ed); 1997 Jul; ():A14. PubMed ID: 11647518
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Assisted suicide and the law.
    N Y Times Web; 1997 Jan; ():A16. PubMed ID: 11647180
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Assisted suicide: no and yes, but mainly yes.
    Hittinger R
    First Things; 1997 Mar; (71)(71):8-10. PubMed ID: 11656604
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The right to die.
    Sunstein CR
    Yale Law J; 1997 Jan; 106(4):1123-63. PubMed ID: 11656791
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Laetrile: should it be banned?
    Clark Me
    Newsweek; 1977 Jun; 89(26):48-53+. PubMed ID: 11661577
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Hands off Laetrile, judge orders FDA; appeal is expected.
    Hogan G
    Washington Post; 1977 Dec; ():A9. PubMed ID: 11648851
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Abortion and the law in 1980.
    Paul EW; Schaap P
    NY Law Sch Law Rev; 1980; 25(3):497-525. PubMed ID: 11664083
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Why Laetrile won't go away.
    Edson L
    N Y Times Mag; 1977 p 41+; 27 Nov 1977():. PubMed ID: 11662576
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.