These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

67 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11662841)

  • 1. The refusal of life-saving medical treatment vs. the state's interest in the preservation of life: a clarification of the interests at stake.
    Davis SM
    Wash Univ Law Q; 1980; 58(1):85-116. PubMed ID: 11662841
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Withholding life-prolonging medical treatment from the institutionalized person--who decides?
    Corbett KA; Raciti RM
    New Engl J Prison Law; 1976; 3(1):47-83. PubMed ID: 11664738
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Family law--guardians of incompetent persons can refuse life-prolonging treatment for their wards.
    Gilman GS
    Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1978; 12(4):1039-57. PubMed ID: 11662777
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The right to die in peace: substituted consent and the mentally incompetent.
    Brant J
    Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1977; 11(4):959-73. PubMed ID: 11664849
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The refusal of life-saving medical treatment vs. the state's interest in the preservation of life: a clarification of the interests at stake.
    Davis SM
    Spec Law Dig Health Care (Mon); 1981 Jul; 3(5):5-36. PubMed ID: 10295112
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Deciding right-to-die cases involving incompetent patients: Jones v. Saikewicz.
    Schultz S; Swartz W; Appelbaum JC
    Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1977; 11(4):936-58. PubMed ID: 11664848
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Force-feeding hunger-striking prisoners: a framework for analysis.
    Ansbacher R
    Univ Fla Law Rev; 1983; 35(1):99-129. PubMed ID: 11658424
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The state's interest in the preservation of life: from Quinlan to Cruzan.
    Peters PG
    Ohio State Law J; 1989; 50(4):891-977. PubMed ID: 16044607
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The right to die: a proposal for natural death legislation.
    Stephenson SA
    Univ Cincinnati Law Rev; 1980; 49(1):228-43. PubMed ID: 11658341
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. New Jersey Advance Directives for Health Care Act.
    New Jersey
    N J Statut Annot N J; 1991 Jul; Chapt. 201 Sects. 26.2H.53 to 26.2H.78():26:2H-53 to 26:2H-78. PubMed ID: 12043617
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The living will--death with dignity or mechanical vitality.
    Wilson PH
    Cumberland Law Rev; 1979; 10(1):163-207. PubMed ID: 11661825
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Death and dying in Tennessee.
    McKenney EJ
    Memphis State Univ Law Rev; 1977; 7(4):503-54. PubMed ID: 11663172
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. In re Quinlan: a synthesis of law and medical technology.
    Hyland WF; Baime DS
    Rutgers Camden Law J; 1976; 8(1):37-64. PubMed ID: 11663167
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The right to refuse medical treatment: under what circumstances does it exist?
    Shaub HZ
    Duquesne Law Rev; 1980; 18(3):607-28. PubMed ID: 11665230
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Right to decline life-prolonging procedures.
    Florida
    Wests Fla Statut Annot Fla; 1985; Sections 765.01 to 765.15(Suppl. Pamphlet):. PubMed ID: 12043654
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Right to refuse life sustaining medical treatment and the noncompetent nonterminally ill patient: an analysis of abridgment and anarchy.
    Adamson EH
    Pepperdine Law Rev; 1990; 17(2):461-92. PubMed ID: 16047420
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The minor's right to consent to medical treatment: a corollary of the constitutional right of privacy.
    Raitt GE
    South Calif Law Rev; 1975 Jun; 48(6):1417-56. PubMed ID: 11664463
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Rights of the terminally ill.
    Am J Trial Advocacy; 1979; 2(2):396-9. PubMed ID: 11661877
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Patient sues to block amputation of leg.
    Kessler R
    Washington Post; 1984 Jun; ():B3. PubMed ID: 11646392
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Patients' rights.
    Simon NF
    Annu Surv Am Law; 1977 Jun; (3):535-59. PubMed ID: 11686180
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.