368 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11662910)
1. Termination of medical treatment.
Horan DJ
Forum; 1981; 16(3):470-87. PubMed ID: 11662910
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Right to die: a survey of legislative and judicial responses to life-support technology.
Richardson E
Glendale Law Rev; 1981-1982; 5(2):188-202. PubMed ID: 11652441
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Proxy decisionmaking for the terminally ill: the Virginia approach.
O'Shaughnessy WJ
Va Law Rev; 1984 Sep; 70(6):1269-302. PubMed ID: 11652483
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Death and dying in Tennessee.
McKenney EJ
Memphis State Univ Law Rev; 1977; 7(4):503-54. PubMed ID: 11663172
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. A new form of medical malpractice?: Missouri's "living will" statute.
Murphy RE
J Mo Bar; 1986; 42(1):11-20. PubMed ID: 11649874
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The "terminal condition" condition in Virginia's Natural Death Act.
Matthew DB
Va Law Rev; 1987 May; 73(4):749-81. PubMed ID: 11652506
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Choosing how to die: the need for reform of Oregon's living will legislation.
Carey RL
Willamette Law Rev; 1987; 23(1):69-92. PubMed ID: 11652517
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The 'crucible of the bedside'.
Med World News; 1985 May; 26(9):112-4. PubMed ID: 11645551
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Termination of medical treatment: imminent legislative issues.
Robinson RC; Horan DJ
Cathol Lawyer; 1987; 31(2):99-111. PubMed ID: 11652516
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. In re living will.
Havens SL
Nova Law J; 1981; 5(3):445-70. PubMed ID: 11649552
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Euthanasia: the right to be 'let' alone.
Hill RE
South Univ Law Rev; 1980; 7(1):101-12. PubMed ID: 11649557
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Decisions for the dying: an empirical study of physicians' responses to advance directives.
Zinberg JM
Vt Law Rev; 1989; 13(2):445-91. PubMed ID: 11653869
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Judicial innovation and policy re-invention: state supreme courts and the right to die.
Glick HR
West Polit Q; 1992; ():71-92. PubMed ID: 11652627
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Withholding life support treatment in Illinois--Part I.
Hodgman DR; Frazer QR
Ill Bar J; 1984 Oct; 73(2):106-11. PubMed ID: 11658588
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Living wills: the need for uniform state laws.
Warnock HC
Probate Prop; 1991; 5(3):52-6. PubMed ID: 11652620
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Withdrawal of life support: conflict among patient wishes, family, physicians, courts and statutes, and the law.
Tarantino LM
Buffalo Law Rev; 1994; 42(2):623-52. PubMed ID: 11652996
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Indiana's Living Wills and Life-Prolonging Procedures Act: a reform proposal.
Mooney CA
Indiana Law Rev; 1987; 20(2):539-58. PubMed ID: 11649962
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. In re Quinlan: a synthesis of law and medical technology.
Hyland WF; Baime DS
Rutgers Camden Law J; 1976; 8(1):37-64. PubMed ID: 11663167
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Decisionmaking in authorizing and withholding life sustaining medical treatment: from Quinlan to Cruzan.
Keilitz I; Bilzor JC; Hafemeister TL; Brown V; Dudyshyn D
Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1989; 13(5):482-93. PubMed ID: 11654759
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Indiana's living wills and life-prolonging procedures act.
Kolb JB
Indiana Law Rev; 1986; 19(1):285-98. PubMed ID: 11649856
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
