These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

307 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11662912)

  • 1. Patent protection for biological inventions--review of recent case law in EEC countries.
    Vossius V
    Eur Intellect Prop Rev; 1979 Oct; 1():278-82. PubMed ID: 11662912
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Patenting biological inventions.
    Schlosser SD
    Univ Toledo Law Rev; 1981; 12(4):925-44. PubMed ID: 11649593
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Patentability of genetic inventions in animals.
    Moufang R
    IIC Int Rev Ind Prop Copyr Law; 1989; 20(6):823-46. PubMed ID: 11650905
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An international comparative analysis of the patentability of recombinant DNA-derived organisms.
    Sparrow CN
    Univ Toledo Law Rev; 1981; 12(4):945-57. PubMed ID: 11649594
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Loopholes appear in genetic engineering patent.
    Yanchinski S
    New Sci; 1981 Sep; 91(1270):642. PubMed ID: 11664153
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Patentability of microorganisms per se.
    Teschemacher R
    IIC Int Rev Ind Prop Copyr Law; 1982 Feb; 13(1):27-41. PubMed ID: 11650706
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Biotechnology patenting: the wicked animal must defend itself.
    Crespi S
    Eur Intellect Prop Rev; 1995 Sep; 17(9):431-41. PubMed ID: 11654979
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Vital essences and human wholeness: the social readings of biological information.
    Kevles DJ
    South Calif Law Rev; 1991 Nov; 65(1):255-78. PubMed ID: 11645834
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Biotechnology patent law developments in Great Britain and the United States: analysis of a hypothetical patent claim for a synthesized virus.
    Auerbach BC
    Boston College Int Comp Law Rev; 1983; 6(2):563-90. PubMed ID: 11649615
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Patients v. patents?: policy implications of recent patent legislation.
    Katopis CJ
    St Johns Law Rev; 1997; 71():329-401. PubMed ID: 11658166
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Patenting life is no guarantee of success.
    Yanchinski S
    New Sci; 1980 Jun; 86(1207):373. PubMed ID: 11664063
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Patent protection for new forms of life.
    Cooper IP
    Fed Bar J; 1979; 38(1):34-48. PubMed ID: 11661766
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Patents for life forms: an inappropriate response to biotechnological advancement.
    Densberger JE
    J Bioeth; 1984; 5(2):91-115. PubMed ID: 11649700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A matter of life and patents.
    Watts S
    New Sci; 1991 Jan; 129(1751):56-61. PubMed ID: 11659287
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Patentability in the United States of microorganisms, processes utilizing microorganisms, products produced by microorganisms and microorganism mutational and genetic modification techniques.
    Biggart WA
    IDEA J Law Technol; 1981; 22(2):113-36. PubMed ID: 11652409
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Patenting gene fragments.
    Agrawal A
    Econ Polit Wkly; 1993 May; 28(22):1089-93. PubMed ID: 11660270
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Patenting of human genes, cells and parts of the body? -- the ethical dimensions of patent law.
    Moufang R
    IIC Int Rev Ind Prop Copyr Law; 1994; 25(4):487-515. PubMed ID: 11660161
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An historical development of patenting microorganisms and genetically engineered animals in the USA and Europe. Part 2. Developments in the EU.
    McTaggart RJ
    Eur J Genet Soc; 1996; 2(2):39-46. PubMed ID: 11654832
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Risky gene tests face tight controls.
    MacKenzie D
    New Sci; 1995 Aug; 147(1990):9. PubMed ID: 11656464
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. DNA 'not life' rules patent office.
    Coghlan A
    New Sci; 1995 Jan; 145(1962):8. PubMed ID: 11659935
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.