These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11662938)

  • 1. Spina bifida: the surgeon's responsibility.
    Eckstein H
    Doc Med Ethics; 1974 Apr 1974, 4 p 3; No():. PubMed ID: 11662938
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Elin Daniels case: an examination of the legal, medical, and ethical considerations posed when parents and doctors disagree on whether to treat a defective newborn.
    Portela C
    Forum; 1983; 18(4):709-27. PubMed ID: 11658577
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bioethical shock.
    White RJ
    America (NY); 1987 Feb; 156(8):174-6. PubMed ID: 11658837
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Intensive care of extremely premature newborns.
    Joseph R
    Singapore J Obstet Gynecol; 1989 Jul; 20(2):45-7. PubMed ID: 11659322
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Suit filed in Oklahoma alleging twenty-four infants died after being denied beneficial medical treatment.
    Paulus SM
    Issues Law Med; 1986 Jan; 1(4):321-30. PubMed ID: 11651816
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The handicapped child.
    Gray OP
    Ethics Med; 1987; 3(3):37-8. PubMed ID: 11651892
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Baby Doe's legacy.
    Carroll JB; Andrusko D
    America (NY); 1985 Jun; 152(21):450-3. PubMed ID: 11658654
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. On letting some babies die.
    Smith DH
    Stud Hastings Cent; 1974 May; 2(2):37-46. PubMed ID: 11661065
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Baby Jane Doe: the ethical issues.
    Conley JJ
    America (NY); 1984 Feb; 150(5):84-9. PubMed ID: 11658402
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Infant Doe: where to draw the line.
    McCormick RA; Tribe LH
    Washington Post; 1982 Jul; ():A15. PubMed ID: 11647757
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Life-and-death lottery in the nursery.
    Hentoff N
    Washington Post; 1984 Apr; ():A21. PubMed ID: 11647767
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Neonatal intensive care and the premature infant: criteria for intervention.
    Freund B
    Humane Med; 1993 Oct; 9(4):282-7. PubMed ID: 11654100
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Treatment dilemmas for imperiled newborns: why quality of life counts.
    Rhoden NK
    South Calif Law Rev; 1985 Sep; 58(6):1283-347. PubMed ID: 11660412
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Withholding care termed 'humane' for some infants.
    Pediatr News; 1974 Nov; 8(11):1+. PubMed ID: 11664757
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Johnson v. Sullivan.
    Nimz MM
    Issues Law Med; 1988; 4(1):123-5. PubMed ID: 11644472
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. What makes a life worth saving?
    Smith HM; Strong C
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1984 Feb; 14(1):48. PubMed ID: 11644133
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Wrongdoing denied in care of 24 handicapped babies.
    Hall HB
    Washington Post; 1985 May; ():A2. PubMed ID: 11646426
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Siamese twins, focus of ethical debate, are separated.
    Ob Gyn News; 1982 Oct 15-31; 17(20):7. PubMed ID: 11655561
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Hospital allegedly let some newborns die.
    Kamen A
    Washington Post; 1985 May; ():A3. PubMed ID: 11647792
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The diagnosis, prognosis, and outcome for the handicapped newborn: a neonatal view.
    McLone DG
    Issues Law Med; 1986 Jul; 2(1):15-24. PubMed ID: 2943693
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.