These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

266 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11662950)

  • 1. Futurity and permissibility of genetic engineering: the legal challenges.
    Westra J
    Ohio North Univ Law Rev; 1974; 1(3):499-509. PubMed ID: 11662950
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Asexual reproduction and genetic engineering: a constitutional assessment of the technology of cloning.
    Pizzulli F
    South Calif Law Rev; 1974 Feb; 47(2):476-584. PubMed ID: 11660870
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. "Unwanted, anonymous, biological descendants": mandatory donation laws and laws prohibiting preembryo discard violate the constitutional right to privacy.
    Brown JP
    Univ San Francisco Law Rev; 1993; 28(1):183-237. PubMed ID: 11659778
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Eugenics and the law's obligation to man.
    Weigel CL; Tinkler SE
    South Tex Law J; 1973; 14(3):361-91. PubMed ID: 11664216
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The impact of recombinant DNA technology on genetic screening.
    Gauthier CC
    Public Aff Q; 1989 Jan; 3(1):25-48. PubMed ID: 11651935
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Roe v. Wade and the traditional legal standards concerning pregnancy.
    Hopkin WR
    Temple Law Q; 1974; 47(4):715-38. PubMed ID: 11664349
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Genetic screening and counseling: the legal and ethical issues.
    Waltz JR; Thigpen CR
    Northwest Univ Law Rev; 1973; 68(4):696-768. PubMed ID: 11662927
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Genetics, eugenics, and public policy.
    Smith GP
    South Ill Univ Law J; 1985; 1985(3):435-53. PubMed ID: 11649816
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Frozen embryos: moral, social, and legal implications.
    Wurmbrand MJ
    South Calif Law Rev; 1986 Jul; 59(5):1079-100. PubMed ID: 11655851
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Abortion and the Constitution: the need for a life-protective amendment.
    Destro RA
    Calif Law Rev; 1975 Sep; 63(5):1250-351. PubMed ID: 11663611
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Manipulating the genetic code: jurisprudential conundrums.
    Smith GP
    Georgetown Law J; 1976 Feb; 64(3):697-733. PubMed ID: 11660899
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Overruling Roe v. Wade: an analysis of the proposed Constitutional amendments.
    Rice CE
    Boston Coll Ind Commer Law Rev; 1973 Dec; 15(2):307-41. PubMed ID: 11663416
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Abortion: a misplaced debate.
    Brockway AR
    Engage Soc Action; 1974 Feb; 2(2):33-47. PubMed ID: 11663497
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The duty to prevent handicaps: laws promoting the prevention of handicaps to newborns.
    Parness JA
    West New Engl Law Rev; 1983; 5(3):431-64. PubMed ID: 11658603
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Oh my God, I'm pregnant.
    Minter CV
    Ohio North Univ Law Rev; 1973; 1(1):119-29. PubMed ID: 11663469
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The new pro-life legislation: patterns and recommendations.
    Witherspoon JP
    St Marys Law J; 1976; 7(4):637-97. PubMed ID: 11664635
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fetal experimentation: moral, legal, and medical implications.
    Reback GL
    Stanford Law Rev; 1974 May; 26(5):1191-207. PubMed ID: 11663472
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sexual sterilization--constitutional validity of involuntary sterilization and consent determinative of voluntariness.
    Baker JD
    Miss Law Rev; 1975; 40(3):509-26. PubMed ID: 11664500
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The landmark abortion decisions: justifiable termination or miscarriage of justice?--proposals for legislative response.
    Scotland AG
    Pac Law J; 1973 Jul; 4(2):821-60. PubMed ID: 11663368
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Confronting objections to an anti-abortion amendment.
    Byrn RM
    America (NY); 1976 Jun; 134(24):529-34. PubMed ID: 11664690
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.