BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11662964)

  • 1. Severely deformed babies in crisis.
    Allen W
    Priest; 1975 Jan; 31(1):31-3. PubMed ID: 11662964
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A matter of life and death: Reform Judaism and the defective child.
    Block RA
    J Reform Jud; 1984; 41(4):14-30. PubMed ID: 11651763
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Engelhardt on the abortion and euthanasia of defective infants.
    Jones GE
    Linacre Q; 1983 May; 50(2):172-81. PubMed ID: 11653532
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The A.M.A. statement on tube feeding: an ethical analysis.
    O'Rourke K
    America (NY); 1986 Nov; 155(15):321-323,331. PubMed ID: 11658770
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The 'right' to die: the case for and against voluntary passive euthanasia.
    Goldberg RT
    Disabil Handicap Soc; 1987; 2(1):21-39. PubMed ID: 11659045
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The legacy of Infant Doe.
    Cosby MG
    Bayl Law Rev; 1982; 34(4):699-715. PubMed ID: 11651747
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Viability, values, and the vast cosmos.
    Horan DJ
    Cathol Lawyer; 1976; 22(1):1-37. PubMed ID: 11663710
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Neonatal euthanasia: Jewish views of a contemporary dilemma.
    Jakobovits Y
    Tradition; 1986; 22(3):13-30. PubMed ID: 11651882
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Infant care review committees: their moral responsibilities.
    Barry RL
    Linacre Q; 1985 Nov; 52(4):361-74. PubMed ID: 11651843
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Selective nontreatment and spina bifida: a case study in ethical theory and application.
    Johnson PR
    Bioethics Q; 1981; 3(2):91-111. PubMed ID: 11645467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Some moral problems of the damaged neonate.
    Hoaglund J
    Philos Context; 1984; 14():19-28. PubMed ID: 11651857
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Karen Quinlan and the freedom of the dying.
    Dundon SJ
    J Value Inq; 1978; 12(4):280-91. PubMed ID: 11651664
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. How much should a child cost? A response to Paul Johnson.
    Burtchaell J
    Linacre Q; 1980 Feb; 47(1):54-63. PubMed ID: 11663076
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Issues in health care meriting particular Christian concern--a priority issue: the severely defective newborn.
    Roy DJ
    Linacre Q; 1982 Feb; 49(1):60-80. PubMed ID: 11650521
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The sanctity of life, the quality of life and the new 'Baby Doe' law.
    Johnstone BV
    Linacre Q; 1985 Aug; 52(3):258-70. PubMed ID: 11649728
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Abortion and infanticide: is there a difference?
    Cannon D
    Policy Rev; 1985; No. 32():12-7. PubMed ID: 11655683
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The tradition of care.
    Piccione JJ
    Euthan Rev; 1986; 1(2):127-37. PubMed ID: 11649798
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. On letting some babies die.
    Smith DH
    Stud Hastings Cent; 1974 May; 2(2):37-46. PubMed ID: 11661065
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Babies Doe, an analysis and response.
    Gellman M
    Shma; 1984 May; 14(274):106-8. PubMed ID: 11651731
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Selective nontreatment of defective newborns: an ethical analysis.
    Johnson PR
    Linacre Q; 1980 Feb; 47(1):39-53. PubMed ID: 11663075
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.