156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11662978)
1. Eugenic sterilization statutes: a constitutional re-evaluation.
Dunn R
J Fam Law; 1975; 14(2):280-308. PubMed ID: 11662978
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Sterilization of the retarded: a problem or a solution?
Murdock CW
Calif Law Rev; 1974 May; 62(3):917-35. PubMed ID: 11663463
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Sexual sterilization--constitutional validity of involuntary sterilization and consent determinative of voluntariness.
Baker JD
Miss Law Rev; 1975; 40(3):509-26. PubMed ID: 11664500
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Validity of statutes authorizing asexualization or sterilization of criminals or mental defectives.
Ghent JF
Am Law Rep ALR 3rd Cases Annot; 1973; 53():960-96. PubMed ID: 12091928
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Eugenic sterilization--involuntary sterilization statute upheld as constitutional.
J Fam Law; 1976; 15(2):344-9. PubMed ID: 11664750
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Involuntary sterilization--a constitutional awakening to fundamental human rights.
Linn B
Amicus; 1977 Feb; 2(2):34-40. PubMed ID: 11664714
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The permissibility of involuntary sterilization under the parens patriae and police power authority of the state: In re Sterilization of Moore.
Gauvey SK; Shuger NB
Univ Md Law Forum; 1976; 6(3):109-28. PubMed ID: 11664760
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Compulsory sterilization: weeding Mendel's garden.
Richardson JM
Drake Law Rev; 1973 Jan; 22(2):355-64. PubMed ID: 11662932
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Involuntary sterilization: an unconstitutional menace to minorities and the poor.
Spriggs EJ
Rev Law Soc Change; 1974; 4(2):127-51. PubMed ID: 11664642
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Constitutional law--legislative naiveté in involuntary sterilization laws.
Shaw RH
Wake Forest Law Rev; 1976; 12(4):1064-81. PubMed ID: 11664745
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Sterilization of the developmentally disabled: shedding some myth-conceptions.
Ross DH
Fla State Univ Law Rev; 1981; 9(4):599-643. PubMed ID: 11658741
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Rights of mentally ill--involuntary sterilization--analysis of recent statutes.
Varner JA
West VA Law Rev; 1975 Dec; 78(1):131-44. PubMed ID: 11664552
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Involuntary sterilization of the mentally retarded: blessing or burden?
Coleman SS
S D Law Rev; 1980; 25(1):55-68. PubMed ID: 11665097
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. In re Moore: the sound and the fury and the scalpel.
Henry NB
North Carol Centr Law J; 1977; 8(2):307-15. PubMed ID: 11664899
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Sterilization of the mentally disabled in Pennsylvania: three generations without legislative guidance are enough.
Estacio RA
Dickinson Law Rev; 1988; 92(2):409-36. PubMed ID: 11659036
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The sterilization of mentally retarded persons: the issues and conflicts.
Paul EW
Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1974 Oct; 3(5):96-9. PubMed ID: 11664325
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Voluntary sterilization for persons with mental disabilities: the need for legislation.
Burnett BA
Syracuse Law Rev; 1981; 32(4):913-55. PubMed ID: 11658516
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Substantive due process--compulsory sterilization of the mentally deficient.
Chernus RO
NY Law Sch Law Rev; 1977; 23(1):151-8. PubMed ID: 11664850
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Three generations, no imbeciles: new light on Buck v. Bell.
Lombardo PA
N Y Univ Law Rev; 1985 Apr; 60(1):30-62. PubMed ID: 11658945
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Sterilization of mental defectives: compulsion and consent.
Comer D
Bayl Law Rev; 1975; 27(1):174-98. PubMed ID: 11660881
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
