242 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11662996)
21. Utilitarian killing, replacement, and rights.
Pluhar E
J Agric Ethics; 1990; 3(2):147-71. PubMed ID: 11659306
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Quality-of-life ethics and constitutional jurisprudence: the demise of natural rights and equal protection for the disabled and incompetent.
Destro RA
J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1986; 2():71-130. PubMed ID: 10317804
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Singer, preference utilitarianism and infanticide.
Sloane A
Stud Christ Ethics; 1999; 12(2):47-73. PubMed ID: 11657929
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. The return of eugenics.
Neuhaus RJ
Commentary; 1988 Apr; 85(4):15-26. PubMed ID: 11658993
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Why is the ethics of euthanasia wrong?
Narbekovas A; Meilius K
Med Etika Bioet; 2004; 11(3-4):2-6. PubMed ID: 16294446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Living and dying.
Singer P
Psychol Today; 1999; 32(1):56-59, 78-79. PubMed ID: 11657157
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Infanticide for the handicapped newborn--a secular rejection.
Davis A
J Med Ethics; 1988 Dec; 14(4):223. PubMed ID: 11644342
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Human life amendment.
Helms J
Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1977 Jan; 123(4):S436-45. PubMed ID: 11664767
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. It has happened here.
Adamek RJ
Hum Life Rev; 1977; 3(4):74-85. PubMed ID: 11663793
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Overruling Roe v. Wade: an analysis of the proposed Constitutional amendments.
Rice CE
Boston Coll Ind Commer Law Rev; 1973 Dec; 15(2):307-41. PubMed ID: 11663416
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Embryo research: the standard arguments.
Institute of Medical Ethics (Great Britain)
Brief Med Ethics; 1990 Mar; No. 5():1-3. PubMed ID: 11659228
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Euthanasia: a soft paradigm for medical ethics.
McIntyre RL
Linacre Q; 1978 Feb; 45(1):41-54. PubMed ID: 11660911
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Nazi bioethics and a doctor's defense.
Crum GE
Hum Life Rev; 1982; 8(3):55-69. PubMed ID: 11651678
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Hippocratic Oath still needed.
Dornan RK
Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1979 Jun; 125(82):E3068-9. PubMed ID: 11665081
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Every granny a wanted granny.
Linklater J
Spectator; 1974 Jul; 233(7620):46. PubMed ID: 11663616
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Abortion and the Constitution: the need for a life-protective amendment.
Destro RA
Calif Law Rev; 1975 Sep; 63(5):1250-351. PubMed ID: 11663611
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Human death as neocortical death: the ethical context.
Weber LJ
Linacre Q; 1974 May; 41(2):106-13. PubMed ID: 11661071
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Towards the abolition of man: the voice of disabled persons cannot be ignored.
Munzarova M
Bull Med Ethics; 2002 Jan; (174):13-21. PubMed ID: 12374187
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Euthanasia in the age of genetic engineering.
Feyerabend E
Reprod Genet Eng; 1989; 2(3):247-9. PubMed ID: 11652007
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Yes, the baby should live.
Davis A
New Sci; 1985 Oct; 108(1480):54. PubMed ID: 11655713
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
