406 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11663026)
1. Is there a right to die?
Grad FP
Columbia J Law Soc Probl; 1976; 12(4):489-529. PubMed ID: 11663026
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. In re Quinlan: one court's answer to the problem of death with dignity.
Falck DP
Wash Lee Law Rev; 1977; 34(1):285-308. PubMed ID: 11663016
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The right to die.
Logan P
Month; 1976 Jun; 9(6):199-202. PubMed ID: 11661306
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Withdrawal and withholding of life-support in terminally ill patients. Part I.
Solnick PB
Med Law; 1984 Sep; 3(4):303-32. PubMed ID: 11651779
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Statutory recognition of the right to die: the California Natural Death Act.
Flannery EJ
Boston Univ Law Rev; 1977 Jan; 57(1):148-77. PubMed ID: 11664705
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The legal aspects of the right to die: before and after the Quinlan decision.
Becker D; Fleming R; Overstreet R
KY Law J; 1977; 65(4):823-79. PubMed ID: 11661533
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Constitutional development of judicial criteria in right-to-die cases: from brain dead to persistent vegetative state.
Morgan R; Harty-Golder B
Wake Forest Law Rev; 1988; 23(4):721-65. PubMed ID: 11652556
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Quinlan, privacy, and the handling of incompetent dying patients.
Cantor NL
Rutgers Law Rev; 1977; 30(2):243-266. PubMed ID: 11661461
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Someone make up my mind: the troubling right to die issues presented by incompetent patients with no prior expression of a treatment preference.
Richard SM
Notre Dame Law Rev; 1989; 64(3):394-421. PubMed ID: 11659243
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The Karen Quinlan case--a constitutional right to die?
Roddy JV
Chicago Bar Rec; 1976; 58(3):120-124+. PubMed ID: 11661598
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. In the Matter of Karen Quinlan. 31 Mar 1976.
New Jersey. Supreme Court
Atl Report; 1976; 355():647-72. PubMed ID: 11646053
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Death with dignity: implementing one's right to die.
Zaremba JF
Univ Detroit Law Rev; 1987; 64(3):557-77. PubMed ID: 11651900
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The right of elderly patients to refuse life-sustaining treatment.
Annas GJ; Glantz LH
Milbank Q; 1986; 64(Suppl. 2):95-162. PubMed ID: 11649886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. In re Storar: the right to die and incompetent patients.
Colabrese CA
Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1982; 43(4):1087-107. PubMed ID: 11658613
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The Nancy Cruzan case.
McCormick RA
Midwest Med Ethics; 1989; 5(1-2):2-31. PubMed ID: 12091960
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. In the shadow of Karen Quinlan.
Bennett SA
Trial; 1976 Sep; 12(9):36-41. PubMed ID: 11664653
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Is there a constitutional right to die?
Wickett A
Euthan Rev; 1986; 1(2):138-50. PubMed ID: 11649799
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The Shulman case and the right to refuse treatment.
Sneiderman B
Humane Med; 1991; 7(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 11651301
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Decisionmaking for the incompetent terminally ill patient: a compromise in a solution eliminates a compromise of patients' rights.
Knezevich CA
Indiana Law J; 1982; 57(2):325-48. PubMed ID: 11649706
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Refusal of life-sustaining treatment for terminally ill incompetent patients: court orders and an alternative.
Rubin BL
Columbia J Law Soc Probl; 1985; 19(1):19-68. PubMed ID: 11658755
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]