These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

417 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11663042)

  • 1. Institutional review boards as an instrument of assessment: research involving human subjects in the U.S.
    Gray BH
    Sci Technol Human Values; 1978; (25):. PubMed ID: 11663042
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A protocol review guide to reduce IRB inconsistency.
    Prentice ED; Antonson DL
    IRB; 1987; 9(1):9-11. PubMed ID: 11649892
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Perspectives of protocol reviewers.
    Moline ML; Aisen MW
    J Calif Alliance Ment Ill; 1994; 5(1):59-60. PubMed ID: 11653327
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Should IRBs monitor research more strictly?
    Christakis NA
    IRB; 1988; 10(2):8-10. PubMed ID: 11650024
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Institutional review boards and public health research: an analysis.
    Hogue LL
    Univ Ark Little Rock Law J; 1978; 1(2):428-54. PubMed ID: 11661619
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Protocol review within the context of a research program.
    Miller FG; Rosenstein DL
    IRB; 1998; 20(4):7-10. PubMed ID: 11657088
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The report of the Advisory Research Committee on the ethics review of research involving human subjects.
    Queens Gazette; 1974 : 1-5, 30 Jan; 6(4) Suppl):. PubMed ID: 11663457
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. IRB review of adverse events in investigational drug studies.
    Prentice ED; Gordon B
    IRB; 1997; 19(6):1-4. PubMed ID: 11656910
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Approving high risk, rejecting low risk: the case of two cases.
    Shannon TA; Ockene IS; Levine RJ
    IRB; 1985; 7(1):6-8. PubMed ID: 11649618
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Judging the ethical merit of clinical trials: what criteria do research ethics board members use?
    Meslin EM; Lavery JV; Sutherland HJ; Till JE
    IRB; 1994; 16(4):6-10. PubMed ID: 11654136
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ethics of research involving children.
    Lynch A
    Ann R Coll Physicians Surg Can; 1992 Oct; 25(6):371-2. PubMed ID: 11659510
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. How many protocols are deferred? One IRB's experience.
    Chlebowski RT
    IRB; 1984; 6(5):9-10. PubMed ID: 11650665
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Human experimentation: the regulation controversy.
    Society; 1975; 13(1):4-12. PubMed ID: 11662982
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Federal investigation concludes that institutional review boards are in trouble.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 1998 Aug; 13(8):1-2. PubMed ID: 11657190
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Human experimentation: the review process in practice.
    Cowan DH
    Case West Reserve Law Rev; 1975; 25(3):533-64. PubMed ID: 11661165
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The burgeoning law of medical experimentation involving human subjects.
    Bryant LE
    John Marshall J Pract Proced; 1974; 8(1):19-51. PubMed ID: 11663465
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Report says institutional review boards are conducting inadequate reviews.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 1998 Sep; 13(9):1-2. PubMed ID: 11660603
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ethics of clinical trials for research ethics boards: proceedings of a national workshop.
    National Council on Bioethics in Human Research (Canada)
    NCBHR Commun; 1991; 2(2):4-23. PubMed ID: 11659919
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Hyperbaric research at Duke University--ethical considerations.
    Bennett PB; Kylstra JA
    Forsvarsmedicin; 1973; 9(3):373-8. PubMed ID: 11661280
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The subject is children.
    Hiatt F
    Trial; 1975; 11(6):19+. PubMed ID: 11662203
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.