These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11663077)
1. The Saikewicz decision and patient autonomy. Lee DE Linacre Q; 1980 Feb; 47(1):64-9. PubMed ID: 11663077 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The limits of proxy decisionmaking for incompetents. Buchanan AE UCLA Law Rev; 1981; 29(2):386-408. PubMed ID: 11660397 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Cruzan and its impact on patient self-determination. Gilbert LJ J Fam Law; 1991-1992; 30(1):111-33. PubMed ID: 11659441 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Medical decisionmaking for incompetent persons: the Massachusetts substituted judgment model. Dunphy SM; Cross JH West New Engl Law Rev; 1987; 9(1):153-67. PubMed ID: 11649910 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The search for objectivity in applying the substituted judgment rule in medical care cases. King JC Boston Bar J; 1993; 37(17):10-12, 14. PubMed ID: 11652649 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. In re Storar: the right to die and incompetent patients. Colabrese CA Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1982; 43(4):1087-107. PubMed ID: 11658613 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Constitutional law--right of privacy--qualified right to refuse medical treatment may be asserted for incompetent under doctrine of substituted judgment. Davis PK Emory Law J; 1978; 27(2):425-60. PubMed ID: 11665011 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Cruzan v. Harmon and the dangerous claim that others can exercise an incapacitated patient's right to die. Ellman IM Jurimetrics; 1989; 29(4):389-401. PubMed ID: 11652559 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The preservation of life and self-determination. McCormick RA; Veatch RM Theol Stud; 1980 Jun; 41(2):390-6. PubMed ID: 11661994 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The due process of dying. Flick MR Calif Law Rev; 1991 Jul; 79(4):1161-7. PubMed ID: 11659478 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Surrogate consent. Richards N Public Aff Q; 1992 Apr; 6(2):227-43. PubMed ID: 11652630 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. A patient's last rights: termination of medical care--an analysis of New York's In re Storar. Day K Albany Law Rev; 1982; 46(4):1380-413. PubMed ID: 11658533 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Deciding right-to-die cases involving incompetent patients: Jones v. Saikewicz. Schultz S; Swartz W; Appelbaum JC Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1977; 11(4):936-58. PubMed ID: 11664848 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The roles of the family in making health care decisions for incompetent patients. Francis LP Utah Law Rev; 1992; 1992(3):861-90. PubMed ID: 11656535 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Superintendent of Belchertown v. Saikewicz. 28 Nov 1977. Massachusetts. Supreme Judicial Court, Hampshire North East Rep Second Ser; 1977; 370():417-35. PubMed ID: 12038337 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The right to die in peace: substituted consent and the mentally incompetent. Brant J Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1977; 11(4):959-73. PubMed ID: 11664849 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Refusal of life-sustaining treatment for terminally ill incompetent patients: court orders and an alternative. Rubin BL Columbia J Law Soc Probl; 1985; 19(1):19-68. PubMed ID: 11658755 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Missing persons: legal perceptions of incompetent patients. Dresser R Rutgers Law Rev; 1994; 46(2):609-719. PubMed ID: 11660406 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Walking in their shoes: paying respect to incompetent patients. Welch DD Vanderbilt Law Rev; 1989 Nov; 42(6):1617-40. PubMed ID: 11650433 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]