These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

278 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11663114)

  • 21. Abortion rights under state constitutions: fighting the abortion war in the state courts.
    Chaput KA
    Oregon Law Rev; 1991; 70(3):593-628. PubMed ID: 11659531
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Constitutional law: minors' access to contraceptives--freed from future restraints?
    Hoyt EE
    Univ Fla Law Rev; 1977; 29(5):1019-29. PubMed ID: 11664911
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Developments--the family. V. Procreative rights.
    Harv Law Rev; 1980 Apr; 93(6):1296-308. PubMed ID: 11665179
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The permissibility of involuntary sterilization under the parens patriae and police power authority of the state: In re Sterilization of Moore.
    Gauvey SK; Shuger NB
    Univ Md Law Forum; 1976; 6(3):109-28. PubMed ID: 11664760
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. S.J. Res. 110: Human Life Federalism Amendment.
    Hatch OG
    Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1981 Sep; 127(131):S10194-8. PubMed ID: 11658572
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Understanding the United States Supreme Court's position on parental consent requirements: in defense of Danforth and Bellotti--a response to Crutchfield.
    Rodman H
    Fam Relat; 1981 Apr; 30(2):182-4. PubMed ID: 11651712
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The judicial portrayal of the physician in abortion and sterilization decisions: the use and abuse of medical discretion.
    Asaro A
    Harv Womens Law J; 1983; 6(1):51-102. PubMed ID: 11658431
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Constitutional law--due process--a state abortion statute that imposes a blanket parental consultation requirement on minors...constitutes a denial of due process.
    Wambeke AM
    J Urban Law; 1980; 57(2):337-63. PubMed ID: 11662839
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey: constitutional principles and political turbulence.
    Bigel AI
    Univ Dayton Law Rev; 1993; 18(3):733-62. PubMed ID: 11659777
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Abortions for minors after Bellotti II: an analysis of state law and a proposal.
    Lozano GD
    St Marys Law J; 1980; 11(4):946-97. PubMed ID: 11658462
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Imposing morality: the pediatrician as parental agent.
    Goldblatt AD
    Politics Life Sci; 1996 Sep; 15(2):292-5. PubMed ID: 11654802
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The consent question--parental and spousal consent for abortions.
    Davis CD
    Tex Hosp; 1976 Sep; 32(9):27-30. PubMed ID: 11664739
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Privacy II: state attempts to regulate abortion.
    Prall S
    Annu Surv Am Law; 1988; 1(2):385-427. PubMed ID: 11652657
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The conflict between "disabling" and "enabling" paradigms in law: sterilization, the developmentally disabled, and the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990.
    Dugan JC
    Cornell Law Rev; 1993 Mar; 78(3):507-42. PubMed ID: 11659683
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Constitutional law--a minor's abortion right under a parental notice statute.
    Czarnecki MS
    Wayne Law Rev; 1982; 28(4):1901-28. PubMed ID: 11658440
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. T.H. v. Jones. 23 Jul 1975.
    U.S. District Court, D. Utah, C.D
    Fed Suppl; 1975; 425():873-90. PubMed ID: 11646068
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A thorn in the side of privacy: the need for reassessment of the constitutional right to abortion.
    Kunz KA
    Marquette Law Rev; 1987; 70(3):534-71. PubMed ID: 11655884
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Constitutional law--right to privacy--municipal roadblock to abortion denounced--City of Akron v. Akron Center for Reproductive Health, Inc., 103 S.Ct. 2481(1983).
    Crusius CJ
    Seton Hall Law Rev; 1984; 14(3):658-82. PubMed ID: 11658811
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Coerced sterilization under federally funded family planning programs.
    Diamond E
    New Engl Law Rev; 1976; 11(2):589-614. PubMed ID: 11664603
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A deceptive liberty: the Supreme Court, minors, and abortion.
    Donnelly TP
    Georgetown Univ Right to Life J; 1983; 3():15-22. PubMed ID: 11655594
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.