These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11663208)
1. Federal statutes--constitutional law--Medicaid Act requires states to fund all medically necessary abortions subject to Hyde Amendment. Flynn EC Notre Dame Lawyer; 1980 Feb; 55(3):412-23. PubMed ID: 11663208 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Constitutional law--health law--constitutionality of the Hyde Amendment--medically necessary abortions need not be funded by the state or federal government under Medicaid--Harris v. McRae, 448 U.S. 297 (1980). Brath MS Whittier Law Rev; 1981; 3(3):381-408. PubMed ID: 11655629 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Constitutional law--United States Supreme Court upholds the constitutionality of the Hyde Amendment...--Harris v. McRae, 100 S.Ct. 2671 (1980). Barnett BA Temple Law Q; 1981; 54(1):109-44. PubMed ID: 11655628 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The Hyde Amendment and Medicaid abortions. Gunty S Forum; 1981; 16(4):825-40. PubMed ID: 11651839 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Public funding of medically necessary abortions is not required under the Medicaid Act: Harris v. McRae, 100 S.Ct. 2671 (1980). Gray AD Tex Tech Law Rev; 1981; 12(2):483-99. PubMed ID: 11655635 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. State of Georgia v. Heckler. U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit Fed Report; 1985 Aug; 768():1293-9. PubMed ID: 11648354 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Harris v. McRae: the Hyde Amendment stands while rights of poor women fall. Sewell CC; Wetterer MA KY Law J; 1980-1981; 69(2):359-91. PubMed ID: 11655486 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Medicaid assistance for elective abortions: the statutory and constitutional issues. Unger ZM St Johns Law Rev; 1976; 50(4):751-70. PubMed ID: 11663170 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Harris v. McRae. 30 Jun 1980. U.S. Supreme Court U S Rep U S Supreme Court; 1980; 448():297-357. PubMed ID: 12038373 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Illinois v. United States Department of Health and Human Services. U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit Fed Report; 1985 Aug; 772():329-35. PubMed ID: 11648364 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Orr v. Nelson. U.S. District Court, D. Nebraska Fed Suppl; 1994 Nov; 902():1019-22. PubMed ID: 11648423 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Doe v. Busbee. U.S. District Court, N.D. Georgia, Atlanta Division Fed Suppl; 1979 Dec; 481():46-50. PubMed ID: 11648343 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Courts differ on states' obligation to fund medically necessary abortions. Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1979 Feb; 8(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 11663973 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Debate on the Hyde Amendment. Flood DJ Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1976 Aug; 122(123):H8631-42. PubMed ID: 11664791 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. States, Congress confront abortion services under Medicaid, health care plan. Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1994 Jan; (1):3-4. PubMed ID: 12345518 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Utah Women's Clinic, Inc. v. Graham. U.S. District Court, D. Utah, C.D Fed Suppl; 1995 Jun; 892():1379-85. PubMed ID: 11648421 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Hern v. Beye. U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit Fed Report; 1995 Jun; 57():906-13. PubMed ID: 11648418 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Denied abortions mean suffering to the needy. Mann J Washington Post; 1980 Apr; ():C1, C3. PubMed ID: 11647334 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Limiting public funds for abortions: state response to Congressional action. Dickinson TM Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1979; 13(4):923-59. PubMed ID: 11664055 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. In spite of ban, U.S. funds 1,000 abortions a week. Rich S; Dugger CW Washington Post; 1980 Aug; ():A11. PubMed ID: 11647327 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]