493 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11663254)
1. The protection of human subjects: an open letter to NIH.
Reynolds PD
Am Sociol; 1974 Nov; 9(4):221-5. PubMed ID: 11663254
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Proposed requirements for informed consent go beyond current federal regulations.
Hum Res Rep; 1994 Jul; 9(7):1-3. PubMed ID: 11659879
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Human experimentation: the regulation controversy.
Society; 1975; 13(1):4-12. PubMed ID: 11662982
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Human guinea pigs: Congress considering limits.
Congr Q Wkly Rep; 1973 Mar; 31(10):519-22. PubMed ID: 11662080
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. HEW proposed policy on the protection of human subjects: experimentation and the institutionalized mentally disabled.
Wash Univ Law Q; 1975; 1975(3):745-74. PubMed ID: 11662989
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Legal and financial encumbrances to clinical research.
Sonnenreich MR
Perspect Biol Med; 1980 Pt 2): S120-S149, Winter; 23(2):. PubMed ID: 11663072
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Human experimentation: the review process in practice.
Cowan DH
Case West Reserve Law Rev; 1975; 25(3):533-64. PubMed ID: 11661165
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Changing federal regulation of IRBs, Part III: social research and the proposed DHEW regulations.
Gray BH
IRB; 1980 Jan; 2(1):1-5+. PubMed ID: 11661793
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The burgeoning law of medical experimentation involving human subjects.
Bryant LE
John Marshall J Pract Proced; 1974; 8(1):19-51. PubMed ID: 11663465
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Commission says institutional review boards should change procedures now.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 1999 Jan; 14(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 11657555
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Experimentation on humans in biomedical research: implications for the industry of recent legislation and cases.
Standridge LW
Women Lawyers J; 1977; 63(3):88-95. PubMed ID: 11663032
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Informed consent in the clinical research setting: experimentation on human subjects.
Owens JF
Med Trial Tech Q; 1987; 33(3):335-50. PubMed ID: 11653829
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Institutional review boards and public health research: an analysis.
Hogue LL
Univ Ark Little Rock Law J; 1978; 1(2):428-54. PubMed ID: 11661619
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. IRB review of adverse events in investigational drug studies.
Prentice ED; Gordon B
IRB; 1997; 19(6):1-4. PubMed ID: 11656910
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. IRBs and epidemiologic research: how inappropriate restrictions hamper studies.
Cann CI; Rothman KJ
IRB; 1984; 6(4):5-7. PubMed ID: 11649562
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. An act...to establish a program of National Research Service Awards...and to provide for the protection of human subjects involved in biomedical and behavioral research.... Approved 12 Jul 1974.
U.S
US Statut Large; 1974; 88 342-354():2-354. PubMed ID: 12085916
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Ethical and legal considerations in dental caries research involving human subjects.
Branson R
J Dent Res; 1980 Jul; 59(Special Issue C):1214-364. PubMed ID: 11651755
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Protection of human subjects.
United States
Code Fed Regul Shipping; 1982 Oct; Part 46, Sections 46.101 to 46.306():. PubMed ID: 11660819
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. OPRR and FDA propose revised expedited review categories.
McGough H
IRB; 1998; 20(1):9, 11. PubMed ID: 11655326
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Report says institutional review boards are conducting inadequate reviews.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 1998 Sep; 13(9):1-2. PubMed ID: 11660603
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
