These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11663255)
1. Current problems and trends in testing of human drugs--especially in regard to institutional review committees. Burrell CD Food Drug Cosmet Law J; 1975 Apr; 30(4):213-8. PubMed ID: 11663255 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Increased review responsibilities for Australian institutional ethics committees. Darvall L IRB; 1995; 17(1):9. PubMed ID: 11653062 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. A noninstitutional review board comes of age. Herman SS IRB; 1989; 11(2):1-6. PubMed ID: 11650173 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Government regulation of scientific research. Robertson JA Jurimetrics; 1979; 19(4):301-38. PubMed ID: 11651670 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The burgeoning law of medical experimentation involving human subjects. Bryant LE John Marshall J Pract Proced; 1974; 8(1):19-51. PubMed ID: 11663465 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Regulatory aspects of the distinction between research and medical practice. McCarthy CR IRB; 1984; 6(3):7-8. PubMed ID: 11649567 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Protection of human subjects. United States Code Fed Regul Shipping; 1982 Oct; Part 46, Sections 46.101 to 46.306():. PubMed ID: 11660819 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Monitoring of drug tests is faulted. Eichenwald K N Y Times Web; 1998 Jun; ():A14. PubMed ID: 11647564 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The noninstitutional review board: a case history. Herman SS IRB; 1984; 6(1):1-3, 12. PubMed ID: 11649540 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Institutional review boards not paying enough attention to active research projects. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 1998 Nov; 13(11):1-2. PubMed ID: 11657741 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Appeal procedures in medical experimentation. Whitmore CW J Leg Med (N Y); 1977 Dec; 5(12):57. PubMed ID: 11643544 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The history of institutional review boards. Sherman M; Van Vleet JD Regul Aff J; 1991; 3():615-27. PubMed ID: 11651491 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Beyond localism: a proposal for a National Research Review Board. Levine C; Caplan AL IRB; 1986; 8(2):7-9. PubMed ID: 11649751 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Who shall decide when doctors disagree? A review of the legal development of informed consent and the implications of proposed lay review of human experimentation. Ratnoff MF Case West Reserve Law Rev; 1975; 25(3):472-532. PubMed ID: 11661164 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Inconsistency, idiosyncrasy, and IRBs. Caplan AL IRB; 1984; 6(2):10-2. PubMed ID: 11649537 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The concept of the IRB and bureaucratic reality: an exchange of letters. van Eys J; Levine RJ IRB; 1984; 6(4):8-10. PubMed ID: 11649563 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Human experimentation: the review process in practice. Cowan DH Case West Reserve Law Rev; 1975; 25(3):533-64. PubMed ID: 11661165 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]