439 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11663256)
1. Decisions to treat critically ill patients: a comparison of social versus medical considerations.
Crane D
Milbank Mem Fund Q; 1975; 53(1):1-33. PubMed ID: 11663256
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Treatment dilemmas for imperiled newborns: why quality of life counts.
Rhoden NK
South Calif Law Rev; 1985 Sep; 58(6):1283-347. PubMed ID: 11660412
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Euthanasia questions stir new debate.
Med World News; 1973 Sep; 14():73-78+. PubMed ID: 11662931
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Withholding or withdrawing life support for newborns: today's ethical problem in neonatology.
Nicolopoulos DA
Prenat Neonatal Med; 1998 Jun; 3(3):358-62. PubMed ID: 11660657
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Jewish perspectives on issues of death and dying.
Rosner F
J Halacha Contemporary Society; 1986; No.11():50-69. PubMed ID: 11652486
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Termination of treatment in the persistent vegetative state.
Cranford RE
Semin Neurol; 1984 Mar; 4(1):36-44. PubMed ID: 11649666
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The Elin Daniels case: an examination of the legal, medical, and ethical considerations posed when parents and doctors disagree on whether to treat a defective newborn.
Portela C
Forum; 1983; 18(4):709-27. PubMed ID: 11658577
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. When illness is judged irreversible: imperative and elective treatments.
Cassem N
Man Med; 1980; 5(3):155-66. PubMed ID: 11643648
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Withdrawal of life-support in the newborn: whose baby is it?
Clark FI
Southwest Univ Law Rev; 1993; 23(1):1-46. PubMed ID: 11659817
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Controversies surrounding the hopelessly ill patient.
Cassem NH
Linacre Q; 1975 May; 42(2):89-98. PubMed ID: 11661176
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Delivery room resuscitation of the high-risk infant: a conflict of rights.
Cooper R
Cathol Lawyer; 1990; 33(4):325-60. PubMed ID: 11659422
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Death, dying and the law: a prosecutorial view of the Quinlan case.
Collester DG
Rutgers Law Rev; 1977; 30(2):304-28. PubMed ID: 11661463
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Decisions to treat critically ill patients: a comparison of social versus medical considerations.
Crane D
Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc; 1975; 53(1):1-33. PubMed ID: 1040132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. New Jersey Advance Directives for Health Care Act.
New Jersey
N J Statut Annot N J; 1991 Jul; Chapt. 201 Sects. 26.2H.53 to 26.2H.78():26:2H-53 to 26:2H-78. PubMed ID: 12043617
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. AIDS-related risk factors, medical diagnosis, do-not-resuscitate orders and aggressiveness of nursing care.
Forrester DA
Nurs Res; 1990; 39(8):350-4. PubMed ID: 11659349
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Decisions not to treat: the Saikewicz case and its aftermath.
Glantz LH; Swazey JP
Bull Am Coll Physicians; 1979 Jan; 2(1):22-32. PubMed ID: 11661768
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. When the neonate is defective.
Contemp Ob Gyn; 1976 Jun; 7(6):90-92+. PubMed ID: 11663000
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Appointing a proxy under the best of circumstances.
White PD
Utah Law Rev; 1992; 1992(3):849-60. PubMed ID: 11656534
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Physicians' attitudes toward the treatment of critically ill patients.
Crane D
Bioscience; 1973 Aug; 23(8):471-4. PubMed ID: 11660864
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Of diagnoses and discrimination: discriminatory nontreatment of infants with HIV infection.
Crossley MA
Columbia Law Rev; 1993 Nov; 93(7):1581-667. PubMed ID: 11659791
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
