These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11663325)
1. Survey finds seven in ten hospitals violate DHEW Guidelines on informed consent for sterilization. Fam Plann Perspect; 1979; 11(6):366-7. PubMed ID: 11663325 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Sterilization of the poor: two views on the need for protection from abuse. Donovan P Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1976 Apr; 5(2):28-30. PubMed ID: 11664604 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Federal sterilization regulations said to impose undue hardships. Ob Gyn News; 1980 Dec; 15(23):25. PubMed ID: 11662820 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Sterilization abuse: a proposed regulatory scheme. De Paul Law Rev; 1979; 28(3):731-68. PubMed ID: 11661937 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Sterilization. Califano JA Forum (Wash); 1978; 2(2):7-13. PubMed ID: 11643514 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Sterilization regulation: government efforts to guarantee informed consent. Prendergast MH Santa Clara Law Rev; 1978; 18(4):971-96. PubMed ID: 11665024 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Abortion, conscience and the Constitution: an examination of federal institutional conscience clauses. Pilpel HF; Patton DE Columbia Human Rights Law Rev; 1974 Fall-1975 Winter; 6(2):279-305. PubMed ID: 11663597 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Recent events highlight sterilization's potential as emotional, political issue. Donovan P Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1977 Dec; 6(6):82-6. PubMed ID: 11664915 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Constitutional law--abortion--private hospital may refuse to perform abortion. Berger B St Louis Univ Law J; 1974; 18(3):440-60. PubMed ID: 11663525 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Sterilization abuse: a proposed regulatory scheme. Kelly ME De Paul Law Rev; 1979; 28(3):731-68. PubMed ID: 11661936 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Proposed rules on sterilization under attack. Logan HJ Washington Post; 1978 Jan; ():A6. PubMed ID: 11648726 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Sterilization abuse: current state of the law and remedies for abuse. Grosboll D Gold Gate Univ Law Rev; 1980; 10(3):1147-89. PubMed ID: 11649446 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Does the state action doctrine compel nominally private hospitals to make abortion services available despite "conscience clauses". Shuger NB Md Law Forum; 1974; 4(3):113-24. PubMed ID: 11663479 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Coerced sterilization under federally funded family planning programs. Diamond E New Engl Law Rev; 1976; 11(2):589-614. PubMed ID: 11664603 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Voe v. Califano. 14 Jul 1977. U.S. District Court, D. Connecticut Fed Suppl; 1977; 434():1058-63. PubMed ID: 11645980 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. DHEW proposes 30-day waiting period for sterilizations; no funds for under 21s, contraceptive hysterectomies. Fam Plann Perspect; 1978; 10(1):39-40. PubMed ID: 340251 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]