306 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11663362)
1. The forest and the trees: Roe v. Wade and its critics.
Heymann PB; Barzelay DE
Boston Univ Law Rev; 1973 Jul; 53(4):765-84. PubMed ID: 11663362
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Roe v. Wade and the traditional legal standards concerning pregnancy.
Hopkin WR
Temple Law Q; 1974; 47(4):715-38. PubMed ID: 11664349
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Whose right to life? Implications of Roe v. Wade.
Cane MB
Fam Law Q; 1973; 7(4):413-32. PubMed ID: 11663407
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Abortion and the law in 1980.
Paul EW; Schaap P
NY Law Sch Law Rev; 1980; 25(3):497-525. PubMed ID: 11664083
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. A decision-theoretic reconstruction of Roe v. Wade.
Lockhart T
Public Aff Q; 1991 Jul; 5(3):243-58. PubMed ID: 11656064
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Rethinking Roe v. Wade.
Wardle LD
Brigh Young Univ Law Rev; 1985; 1985(2):231-64. PubMed ID: 11655792
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The landmark abortion decisions: justifiable termination or miscarriage of justice?--proposals for legislative response.
Scotland AG
Pac Law J; 1973 Jul; 4(2):821-60. PubMed ID: 11663368
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The abortion cases: a study in law and social change.
Rubin ER
North Carol Centr Law J; 1974; 5(2):215-53. PubMed ID: 11663476
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The erosion of Roe v. Wade; do minors have any rights?
Sourial WH
Whittier Law Rev; 1992; 13(1):285-332. PubMed ID: 11656215
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Roe v. Wade: its impact on rights of choice in human reproduction.
Patton DE
Columbia Human Rights Law Rev; 1973; 5(2):497-521. PubMed ID: 11663415
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Unraveling compromise.
Olsen F
Harv Law Rev; 1989 Nov; 103(1):105-35. PubMed ID: 11655993
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Webster v. Reproductive Health Services: devaluing the right to choose.
Binion G
Women Polit; 1991; 11(2):41-60. PubMed ID: 11656100
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Abortion and a nation at war.
First Things; 1992 Oct; 26():9-13. PubMed ID: 11659506
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. From arguments to Supreme Court opinions in Planned Parenthood v. Casey.
Kassop N
PS (Wash DC); 1993 Mar; 26(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 12085874
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Oh my God, I'm pregnant.
Minter CV
Ohio North Univ Law Rev; 1973; 1(1):119-29. PubMed ID: 11663469
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The invalidity of Canada's abortion law--section 251 of the Criminal Code.
Picher PC
Crim Rep Can New Ser; 1974; 24():1-31. PubMed ID: 11663529
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The Human Life Federalism Amendment: an assessment.
Caron WR
Cathol Lawyer; 1982; 27(2):87-111. PubMed ID: 11655614
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The new pro-life legislation: patterns and recommendations.
Witherspoon JP
St Marys Law J; 1976; 7(4):637-97. PubMed ID: 11664635
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Overruling Roe v. Wade: an analysis of the proposed Constitutional amendments.
Rice CE
Boston Coll Ind Commer Law Rev; 1973 Dec; 15(2):307-41. PubMed ID: 11663416
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. What the Court giveth: abortion and Bill C-43.
Noonan SM
Queens Law J; 1991; 16():321-45. PubMed ID: 11656415
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
