These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

305 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11663362)

  • 21. Roe v. Wade: some definitional considerations.
    Nolan-Haley JM; Hilgers TW
    Hum Life Rev; 1977; 3(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 11662326
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Feminist litigation: an oxymoron? -- a study of the briefs filed in William L. Webster v. Reproductive Health Services.
    Colker R
    Harv Womens Law J; 1990; 13():137-88. PubMed ID: 11656053
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The wages of crying wolf: a comment on Roe v. Wade.
    Ely JH
    Yale Law J; 1973 Apr; 82(5):920-49. PubMed ID: 11663374
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The unborn and the born again.
    New Repub; 1977 Jul; 177(27):5-6+. PubMed ID: 11663777
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Burying the dead: the case against revival of pre-Roe and pre-Casey abortion statutes in a post-Casey world.
    Scott TL
    Rev Law Soc Change; 1991-1992; 19(2):355-89. PubMed ID: 11656256
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Closing the circle of constitutional review from Griswold v. Connecticut to Roe v. Wade: an outline of a decision merely overruling Roe.
    Van Alstyne W
    Duke Law J; 1989 Dec; 1989(6):1677-88. PubMed ID: 11656009
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Doe v. Beal: abortion, Medicaid, and equal protection.
    Wilcox JK
    Va Law Rev; 1976 May; 62(4):811-37. PubMed ID: 11663695
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Roe v. Wade and Doe v. Bolton: the compelling state interest test in substantive due process.
    Gelinas A
    Wash Lee Law Rev; 1973; 30(3):628-46. PubMed ID: 11663508
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The lords and givers of life.
    Csank JF
    Hum Life Rev; 1977; 3(2):75-100. PubMed ID: 11663730
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Implications of the coming retreat from Roe v. Wade.
    Rice CF
    J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1988; 4():1-21. PubMed ID: 11645610
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Why Roe v. Wade should be overruled.
    Loewy AH
    North Carol Law Rev; 1989 Apr; 67(4):939-48. PubMed ID: 11655982
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. ERA: equal rights for abortion?
    Noonan JT
    Hum Life Rev; 1984; 10(2):29-44. PubMed ID: 11651741
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Roe to Casey: a survey of abortion law.
    Pirner RK; Williams LB
    Washburn Law J; 1993; 32(2):166-89. PubMed ID: 11659798
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The right of privacy and restraints on abortion under the "undue burden" test: a jurisprudential comparison of Planned Parenthood v. Casey with European practice and Italian law.
    Ross CS
    Indiana Int Comp Law Rev; 1993; 3():199-231. PubMed ID: 12091926
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Roe v. Wade--the abortion decision--an analysis and its implications.
    Riggs T
    San Diego Law Rev; 1973 Jun; 10(4):844-56. PubMed ID: 11661026
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Abortion: rights or technicalities? A comparison of Roe v. Wade with the abortion decision of the German Federal Constitutional Court.
    Brown HO
    Hum Life Rev; 1975; 1(3):60-74. PubMed ID: 11662181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Emancipation as freedom in Roe v. Wade.
    Bezanson RP
    Dickinson Law Rev; 1993; 97(3):485-512. PubMed ID: 11656343
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The America we seek: a statement of pro-life principle and concern.
    Agee MC; Argue D; Arkes H
    First Things; 1996 May; 63():40-4. PubMed ID: 11654353
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Trimesters and technology: revamping Roe v. Wade.
    Rhoden NK
    Yale Law J; 1986 Mar; 95(4):639-97. PubMed ID: 11655828
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Forced labor: a thirteenth amendment defense of abortion.
    Koppelman A
    Northwest Univ Law Rev; 1990; 84(2):480-535. PubMed ID: 11656392
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.