BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

299 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11663377)

  • 1. Protection of the unborn--introduction of a joint resolution.
    Buckley JL
    Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1973 May; 119(82):S9973-92. PubMed ID: 11663377
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Abortion: history, opinions, and what's new in the United States.
    Jubb ED
    Can Bar J; 1973 Jul; 4(3):8-12. PubMed ID: 11663761
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Abortion and the Constitution: the need for a life-protective amendment.
    Destro RA
    Calif Law Rev; 1975 Sep; 63(5):1250-351. PubMed ID: 11663611
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Introduction of S.J. Res. 140 and S.J. Res. 141.
    Buckley J
    Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1975 Oct; 121(153):S18193-214. PubMed ID: 11663650
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. On a constitutional amendment protecting unborn human life.
    United States Catholic Conference
    Cathol Mind; 1974 Oct; 72(1286):43-64. PubMed ID: 11661138
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Senate Joint Resolution 10 and Senate Joint Resolution 11--right to life amendments.
    Buckley J
    Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1975 Jan; 121(7):S651-72. PubMed ID: 11663644
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Roe v. Wade and the traditional legal standards concerning pregnancy.
    Hopkin WR
    Temple Law Q; 1974; 47(4):715-38. PubMed ID: 11664349
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Homo sapienism: critique of Roe v. Wade and abortion.
    Lewis JL
    Albany Law Rev; 1975; 39(4):856-93. PubMed ID: 11661205
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Supreme Court 1972 term. Foreward: toward a model of roles in the due process of life and law.
    Tribe LH
    Harv Law Rev; 1973 Nov; 87(1):1-53. PubMed ID: 11663596
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Impact of the abortion decisions upon the father's role.
    Witherspoon JP
    Jurist; 1975; 35(1):32-65. PubMed ID: 11664577
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Protecting the unborn.
    Ramsey P
    Commonweal; 1974 May; 100(13):308-14. PubMed ID: 11663442
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Judicial power and the right to life.
    Noonan JT
    Tablet; 1973 Apr; 227(6927):323-6. PubMed ID: 11660868
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Confronting objections to an anti-abortion amendment.
    Byrn RM
    America (NY); 1976 Jun; 134(24):529-34. PubMed ID: 11664690
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The wisdom of the Supreme Court decision on abortion.
    Packwood RW
    Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1975 Mar; 121(39):S3644-68. PubMed ID: 11664533
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The abortion decision: a balancing of rights.
    Evans JC
    Christ Century; 1973 Feb; 90(7):195-7. PubMed ID: 11663384
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Respect for life: Jewish and Roman Catholic reflections on abortion and related issues.
    Los Angeles Catholic-Jewish Respect Life Committee
    Cathol Mind; 1978 Feb; 76(1320):54-64. PubMed ID: 11663824
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Oh my God, I'm pregnant.
    Minter CV
    Ohio North Univ Law Rev; 1973; 1(1):119-29. PubMed ID: 11663469
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How to argue about abortion: continuing the discussion.
    Burtchaell JT
    Christ Crisis; 1977 Dec; 37(21):313-6. PubMed ID: 11663816
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Brain birth: a proposal for defining when a fetus is entitled to human life status.
    Gertler GB
    South Calif Law Rev; 1986 Jul; 59(5):1061-78. PubMed ID: 11655850
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Roe v. Wade--the abortion decision--an analysis and its implications.
    Riggs T
    San Diego Law Rev; 1973 Jun; 10(4):844-56. PubMed ID: 11661026
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.