193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11663378)
1. When does life begin?
Hatfield MO
Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1973 May; 119(82):S9993-10001. PubMed ID: 11663378
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Prenatal diagnosis and selective abortion.
Lebacqz KA
Linacre Q; 1973 May; 40(2):109-27. PubMed ID: 11660959
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The social, theological and biological context of abortion: 10th anniversary reflections on Roe v. Wade.
Williams GH
Linacre Q; 1983 Nov; 50(4):335-54. PubMed ID: 11655584
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The due process clause and the unborn child.
McKernan MF
Dimension; 1973; 5(1):25-34. PubMed ID: 11663410
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Abortion and self-defense.
Davis N
Philos Public Aff; 1984; 13(3):175-207. PubMed ID: 11655659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Abortion and degrees of personhood: understanding why the abortion problem (and the animal rights problem) are irresolvable.
Li HL
Public Aff Q; 1997 Jan; 11(1):1-19. PubMed ID: 11656703
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Abortion: history, opinions, and what's new in the United States.
Jubb ED
Can Bar J; 1973 Jul; 4(3):8-12. PubMed ID: 11663761
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The Supreme Court on abortion--a dissenting opinion.
Onley PT; McKenna RJ
Cathol Lawyer; 1973; 19(1):19-28. PubMed ID: 11663413
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. On a constitutional amendment protecting unborn human life.
United States Catholic Conference
Cathol Mind; 1974 Oct; 72(1286):43-64. PubMed ID: 11661138
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The Borowski case.
Shumiatcher MC
Rev Gen Droit; 1989; 20():299-324. PubMed ID: 11656436
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Abortion rights after South Dakota.
McDonagh E
Free Inq; 2006; 26(4):34-8. PubMed ID: 16830439
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Women's rights vs. Catholic dogma.
Moriarty C
Int Social Rev; 1973 Mar; 34(3):8-11+. PubMed ID: 11664686
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Fetal relationality in feminist philosophy: an anthropological critique.
Morgan LM
Hypatia; 1996; 11(3):47-70. PubMed ID: 11657438
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Pro and con: should abortions be outlawed?
Hyde HJ; Mulhauser K
US News World Rep; 1981 May; 90(17):31-2. PubMed ID: 11655410
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Abortion and euthanasia: recent developments of the law.
Horan DJ
Forum; 1977; 12(4):960-79. PubMed ID: 11663978
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Abortion and the Constitution: the need for a life-protective amendment.
Destro RA
Calif Law Rev; 1975 Sep; 63(5):1250-351. PubMed ID: 11663611
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. In the beginning: the legal status of early embryos.
Robertson JA
Va Law Rev; 1990 Apr; 76(3):437-517. PubMed ID: 11659369
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The Supreme Court 1972 term. Foreward: toward a model of roles in the due process of life and law.
Tribe LH
Harv Law Rev; 1973 Nov; 87(1):1-53. PubMed ID: 11663596
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Haunting shadows from the rubble of Roe's right of privacy.
Haley JN
Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1974; 9(1):145-84. PubMed ID: 11664401
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. A debate on abortion.
Hasker W; Sullivan TD
Hum Life Rev; 1979; 5(2):28-48. PubMed ID: 11663944
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
