These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11663389)

  • 1. The abortion decision--a qualified constitutional right in the United States: whither Canada?
    Cheung KW
    Can Bar Rev; 1973 Dec; 51(4):643-58. PubMed ID: 11663389
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Doe and Roe: where do we go from here?
    Goodman J; Schoenbrod RC; Stearns N
    Womens Rights Law Report; 1973; 1(4):20-38. PubMed ID: 11663391
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Abortion: the five-year revolution and its impact.
    Conger J
    Ecol Law Q; 1973; 3(2):311-47. PubMed ID: 11663390
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Whose right to life? Implications of Roe v. Wade.
    Cane MB
    Fam Law Q; 1973; 7(4):413-32. PubMed ID: 11663407
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Roe v. Wade: its impact on rights of choice in human reproduction.
    Patton DE
    Columbia Human Rights Law Rev; 1973; 5(2):497-521. PubMed ID: 11663415
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The right to abortion: expansion of the right to privacy through the Fourteenth Amendment.
    Goldenberg D
    Cathol Lawyer; 1973; 19(1):36-57. PubMed ID: 11663414
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Abortion and liberalism: a comparison between the abortion decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States and the Constitutional Court of West Germany.
    Morris DG
    Hastings Int Comp Law Rev; 1988; 11(2):159-245. PubMed ID: 11655935
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Roe v. Wade and Doe v. Bolton: the compelling state interest test in substantive due process.
    Gelinas A
    Wash Lee Law Rev; 1973; 30(3):628-46. PubMed ID: 11663508
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Validity, under Federal Constitution, of abortion laws.
    Shapiro SR
    US Supreme Court Rep; 1974; 35():735-69. PubMed ID: 11663483
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Planned Parenthood v. Casey: the flight from reason in the Supreme Court.
    Linton PB
    St Louis Univ Public Law Rev; 1993; 13(1):15-137. PubMed ID: 11656611
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Webster amicus curiae briefs: perspectives on the abortion controversy and the role of the Supreme Court -- amici for appellees.
    Annas GJ
    Am J Law Med; 1989; 15(2-3):169-203. PubMed ID: 11644396
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Casey, Bray and beyond: religious liberty and the abortion debate.
    Simmons PD
    St Louis Univ Public Law Rev; 1993; 13(1):467-88. PubMed ID: 11656618
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Abortion in the common law world.
    Veitch E; Tracey R
    Am J Comp Law; 1974; 12(4):652-96. PubMed ID: 11663456
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Moral sentiment in judicial opinions on abortion.
    Moore EN
    Santa Clara Lawyer; 1975; 15(3):591-634. PubMed ID: 11663584
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Roe v. Wade. 22 Jan 1973.
    U.S. Supreme Court
    U S Rep U S Supreme Court; 1973; 410():113-78. PubMed ID: 12038376
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The woman's right of privacy.
    Weddington S
    Perkins J; 1973; 27(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 11660987
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A thorn in the side of privacy: the need for reassessment of the constitutional right to abortion.
    Kunz KA
    Marquette Law Rev; 1987; 70(3):534-71. PubMed ID: 11655884
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Abortion: rights or technicalities? A comparison of Roe v. Wade with the abortion decision of the German Federal Constitutional Court.
    Brown HO
    Hum Life Rev; 1975; 1(3):60-74. PubMed ID: 11662181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Abortion and the right of privacy.
    Ortega ML
    Philipp Law J; 1973; 48(4-5):652-95. PubMed ID: 11663743
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. United States Supreme Court and abortion: part 2.
    Holman EJ
    JAMA; 1973 Jul; 225(3):343-4. PubMed ID: 11643547
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.