These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11663389)

  • 21. Canada's Roe: the Canadian abortion decision and its implications for American constitutional law and theory.
    Conkle DO
    Const Comment; 1989; 6(2):299-318. PubMed ID: 11655992
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. roe v. Wade: the right of privacy revisited.
    Wheeler LA; Kovar SL
    Univ Kans Law Rev; 1973; 21(4):527-48. PubMed ID: 11663470
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The Morgentaler judgment: constitutional rights, legislative intention, and institutional design.
    Weinrib LE
    Univ Tor Law J; 1992; 42(1):22-76. PubMed ID: 11656266
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Emancipation as freedom in Roe v. Wade.
    Bezanson RP
    Dickinson Law Rev; 1993; 97(3):485-512. PubMed ID: 11656343
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Feminist litigation: an oxymoron? -- a study of the briefs filed in William L. Webster v. Reproductive Health Services.
    Colker R
    Harv Womens Law J; 1990; 13():137-88. PubMed ID: 11656053
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The abortion cases: a return to Lochner, or a new substantive due process?
    Albany Law Rev; 1973; 37(4):776-97. PubMed ID: 11663363
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Woman, womb, and bodily integrity.
    Neff CL
    Yale J Law Fem; 1991; 3(2):327-53. PubMed ID: 11656226
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Losing the negative right of privacy: building sexual and reproductive freedom.
    Copelon R
    Rev Law Soc Change; 1990-1991; 18(1):15-50. PubMed ID: 11656169
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. "Keep your laws off my body": abortion regulation and the takings clause.
    Looper-Friedman SE
    New Engl Law Rev; 1995; 29(2):253-84. PubMed ID: 11656525
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Roe v. Wade and the traditional legal standards concerning pregnancy.
    Hopkin WR
    Temple Law Q; 1974; 47(4):715-38. PubMed ID: 11664349
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Trimesters and technology: revamping Roe v. Wade.
    Rhoden NK
    Yale Law J; 1986 Mar; 95(4):639-97. PubMed ID: 11655828
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Perspectives on the abortion controversy: amici for appellees -- Brief for bioethicists for privacy as amicus curiae supporting appellees Webster and women's equality Webster and the fundamental right to make medical decisions Abortion counseling and the First Amendment: open questions after Webster Brief for 885 law professors in support of maintaining adherence to the Roe decision.
    Annas GJ; Glantz LH; Mariner WK; Johnsen D; Wilder MJ; Orentlicher D; Pine RN; Michelman FI; Redlich N; Neuwirth SR; Carty-Bennia D
    Am J Law Med; 1990 Jan; 15(2-3):169-203. PubMed ID: 11656584
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The wages of crying wolf: a comment on Roe v. Wade.
    Ely JH
    Yale Law J; 1973 Apr; 82(5):920-49. PubMed ID: 11663374
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Roe v. Wade and In re Quinlan: individual decision and the scope of privacy's constitutional guarantee.
    Archbold P
    Univ San Francisco Law Rev; 1977; 12(1):111-53. PubMed ID: 11663841
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Self-identification and the morality of abortion.
    Lusby K
    Univ Toledo Law Rev; 1992; 24(1):121-58. PubMed ID: 11656258
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Webster v. Reproductive Health Services: devaluing the right to choose.
    Binion G
    Women Polit; 1991; 11(2):41-60. PubMed ID: 11656100
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Abortion and liberalized abortion laws.
    Hogan Le
    Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1973 Jul; 119(111):H6121-32. PubMed ID: 11663405
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Roe v. Wade: a retrospective look at a judicial oxymoron.
    Coleman JJ
    St Louis Univ Law J; 1984 Dec; 29(7):7-44. PubMed ID: 11655813
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The forest and the trees: Roe v. Wade and its critics.
    Heymann PB; Barzelay DE
    Boston Univ Law Rev; 1973 Jul; 53(4):765-84. PubMed ID: 11663362
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Why a constitutional amendment?
    Noonan JT
    Hum Life Rev; 1975; 1(1):26-43. PubMed ID: 11663540
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.