These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

332 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11663390)

  • 41. A thorn in the side of privacy: the need for reassessment of the constitutional right to abortion.
    Kunz KA
    Marquette Law Rev; 1987; 70(3):534-71. PubMed ID: 11655884
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Abortion: rights or technicalities? A comparison of Roe v. Wade with the abortion decision of the German Federal Constitutional Court.
    Brown HO
    Hum Life Rev; 1975; 1(3):60-74. PubMed ID: 11662181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. A lesson in judicial abdication: Roe v. Arizona Board of Regents and the right of privacy.
    Sirkis JE
    Ariz State Law J; 1976; 1976(3):499-524. PubMed ID: 11663820
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Roe v. Wade and the traditional legal standards concerning pregnancy.
    Hopkin WR
    Temple Law Q; 1974; 47(4):715-38. PubMed ID: 11664349
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Forced labor: a thirteenth amendment defense of abortion.
    Koppelman A
    Northwest Univ Law Rev; 1990; 84(2):480-535. PubMed ID: 11656392
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Population control and abortion.
    Freeman HA
    Santa Clara Lawyer; 1973; 13(4):698-719. PubMed ID: 11663595
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Perspectives on the abortion controversy: amici for appellees -- Brief for bioethicists for privacy as amicus curiae supporting appellees Webster and women's equality Webster and the fundamental right to make medical decisions Abortion counseling and the First Amendment: open questions after Webster Brief for 885 law professors in support of maintaining adherence to the Roe decision.
    Annas GJ; Glantz LH; Mariner WK; Johnsen D; Wilder MJ; Orentlicher D; Pine RN; Michelman FI; Redlich N; Neuwirth SR; Carty-Bennia D
    Am J Law Med; 1990 Jan; 15(2-3):169-203. PubMed ID: 11656584
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Notes from the field: a reply to Professor Colker.
    Burns SE
    Harv Womens Law J; 1990; 13():189-206. PubMed ID: 11656054
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Canada's Roe: the Canadian abortion decision and its implications for American constitutional law and theory.
    Conkle DO
    Const Comment; 1989; 6(2):299-318. PubMed ID: 11655992
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Death before life: abortion as a moral symbol.
    Frankel LH; Flynn JJ
    J Contemp Law; 1975; 1(2):267-85. PubMed ID: 11662359
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Abortion compromise -- inevitable and impossible.
    Law SA
    Univ Ill Law Rev; 1992; 25(4):921-41. PubMed ID: 11656296
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. The future of abortion.
    McDaniel A
    Newsweek; 1989 Jul; 114(3):14-21, 24-27. PubMed ID: 11655929
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Rethinking Roe v. Wade.
    Wardle LD
    Brigh Young Univ Law Rev; 1985; 1985(2):231-64. PubMed ID: 11655792
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Privacy and abortion rights under the Louisiana state constitution: could Roe v. Wade be alive and well in the Bayou state?
    Devlin J
    LA Law Rev; 1991 Mar; 51(4):685-732. PubMed ID: 11656097
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Some thoughts on autonomy and equality in relation to Roe v. Wade.
    Ginsburg RB
    North Carol Law Rev; 1985 Jan; 63(2):375-86. PubMed ID: 11656660
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Abortion and section 7 of the Charter: proposing a constitutionally valid foetal protection law.
    McCourt KM; Love DJ
    Manit Law J; 1989; 18(3):365-94. PubMed ID: 11656021
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Webster v. Reproductive Health Services: devaluing the right to choose.
    Binion G
    Women Polit; 1991; 11(2):41-60. PubMed ID: 11656100
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Fetal viability as a threshold to personhood. A legal analysis.
    Peterfy A
    J Leg Med; 1995 Dec; 16(4):607-36. PubMed ID: 8568420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Committee to Defend Reproductive Rights v. Myers: procreative choice guaranteed for all women.
    Erca A
    Gold Gate Univ Law Rev; 1982; 12(3):691-716. PubMed ID: 11655619
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The woman's right of privacy.
    Weddington S
    Perkins J; 1973; 27(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 11660987
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.