These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11663391)
1. Doe and Roe: where do we go from here? Goodman J; Schoenbrod RC; Stearns N Womens Rights Law Report; 1973; 1(4):20-38. PubMed ID: 11663391 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The right to abortion: expansion of the right to privacy through the Fourteenth Amendment. Goldenberg D Cathol Lawyer; 1973; 19(1):36-57. PubMed ID: 11663414 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The abortion decision--a qualified constitutional right in the United States: whither Canada? Cheung KW Can Bar Rev; 1973 Dec; 51(4):643-58. PubMed ID: 11663389 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Abortion: the five-year revolution and its impact. Conger J Ecol Law Q; 1973; 3(2):311-47. PubMed ID: 11663390 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Moral sentiment in judicial opinions on abortion. Moore EN Santa Clara Lawyer; 1975; 15(3):591-634. PubMed ID: 11663584 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Validity, under Federal Constitution, of abortion laws. Shapiro SR US Supreme Court Rep; 1974; 35():735-69. PubMed ID: 11663483 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Roe v. Wade: its impact on rights of choice in human reproduction. Patton DE Columbia Human Rights Law Rev; 1973; 5(2):497-521. PubMed ID: 11663415 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Whose right to life? Implications of Roe v. Wade. Cane MB Fam Law Q; 1973; 7(4):413-32. PubMed ID: 11663407 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The forest and the trees: Roe v. Wade and its critics. Heymann PB; Barzelay DE Boston Univ Law Rev; 1973 Jul; 53(4):765-84. PubMed ID: 11663362 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The Webster amicus curiae briefs: perspectives on the abortion controversy and the role of the Supreme Court -- amici for appellees. Annas GJ Am J Law Med; 1989; 15(2-3):169-203. PubMed ID: 11644396 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Court-ordered cesareans: can a pregnant woman refuse? Leavine BA Houst Law Rev; 1992; 29(1):185-218. PubMed ID: 11656666 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Roe v. Wade and Doe v. Bolton: the compelling state interest test in substantive due process. Gelinas A Wash Lee Law Rev; 1973; 30(3):628-46. PubMed ID: 11663508 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Abortion and a nation at war. First Things; 1992 Oct; 26():9-13. PubMed ID: 11659506 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Emancipation as freedom in Roe v. Wade. Bezanson RP Dickinson Law Rev; 1993; 97(3):485-512. PubMed ID: 11656343 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Abortion rights in America. Bullock JR Brigh Young Univ Law Rev; 1994; 1994(1):63-94. PubMed ID: 11656488 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Abortion in the common law world. Veitch E; Tracey R Am J Comp Law; 1974; 12(4):652-96. PubMed ID: 11663456 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Abortion and the right of privacy. Ortega ML Philipp Law J; 1973; 48(4-5):652-95. PubMed ID: 11663743 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Forced labor: a thirteenth amendment defense of abortion. Koppelman A Northwest Univ Law Rev; 1990; 84(2):480-535. PubMed ID: 11656392 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Roe v. Wade. 22 Jan 1973. U.S. Supreme Court U S Rep U S Supreme Court; 1973; 410():113-78. PubMed ID: 12038376 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Unenumerated rights: whether and how Roe should be overruled. Dworkin R Univ Chic Law Rev; 1992; 59(1):381-432. PubMed ID: 11656301 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]