These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11663391)
21. A lesson in judicial abdication: Roe v. Arizona Board of Regents and the right of privacy. Sirkis JE Ariz State Law J; 1976; 1976(3):499-524. PubMed ID: 11663820 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. The fetus and the law--whose life is it anyway? Gallagher J Ms; 1984 Sep; 13(3):62, 64, 66+. PubMed ID: 11655606 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Planned Parenthood v. Casey: the flight from reason in the Supreme Court. Linton PB St Louis Univ Public Law Rev; 1993; 13(1):15-137. PubMed ID: 11656611 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. The wages of crying wolf: a comment on Roe v. Wade. Ely JH Yale Law J; 1973 Apr; 82(5):920-49. PubMed ID: 11663374 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Feminist litigation: an oxymoron? -- a study of the briefs filed in William L. Webster v. Reproductive Health Services. Colker R Harv Womens Law J; 1990; 13():137-88. PubMed ID: 11656053 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Casey, Bray and beyond: religious liberty and the abortion debate. Simmons PD St Louis Univ Public Law Rev; 1993; 13(1):467-88. PubMed ID: 11656618 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. The legal impact of the Roe and Doe decisions. Granfield D Jurist; 1973; 33(2):113-22. PubMed ID: 11663427 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. roe v. Wade: the right of privacy revisited. Wheeler LA; Kovar SL Univ Kans Law Rev; 1973; 21(4):527-48. PubMed ID: 11663470 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Envisioning a future for reproductive liberty: strategies for making the rights real. Pine RN; Law SA Harv Civ Rights-Civil Lib Law Rev; 1992; 27(2):407-63. PubMed ID: 11656200 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. The abortion cases: a study in law and social change. Rubin ER North Carol Centr Law J; 1974; 5(2):215-53. PubMed ID: 11663476 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Why a constitutional amendment? Noonan JT Hum Life Rev; 1975; 1(1):26-43. PubMed ID: 11663540 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Implications of the abortion decisions: post Roe and Doe litigation and legislation. Wasserman R Columbia Law Rev; 1974 Mar; 74(2):237-68. PubMed ID: 11664412 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. A thorn in the side of privacy: the need for reassessment of the constitutional right to abortion. Kunz KA Marquette Law Rev; 1987; 70(3):534-71. PubMed ID: 11655884 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Is Roe v. Wade obsolete? Destro RA Hum Life Rev; 1998; 24(3):55-70. PubMed ID: 11657681 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]