These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11663399)

  • 1. Drug control of school children: the child's right to choose.
    Wells WW
    South Calif Law Rev; 1973 Jun; 46(3):585-616. PubMed ID: 11663399
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An analysis of the legal issue surrounding the forced use of Ritalin: protecting a child's right to "just say no.
    O'Leary JC
    New Engl Law Rev; 1993; 27(4):1173-209. PubMed ID: 11659842
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Coercive behavior control in the schools: reconciling "individually appropriate" education with damaging changes in educational status.
    Jones RW
    Stanford Law Rev; 1976 Nov; 29(1):93-125. PubMed ID: 11664742
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. rogers v. Okin: a lawsuit to guarantee patients' right to refuse anti-psychotic medication.
    Cole RW
    Am J Forensic Psychiatry; 1978 May; 1(1):104-73. PubMed ID: 11661981
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Legislating the control of behavior control: autonomy and the coercive use of organic therapies.
    Shapiro MH
    South Calif Law Rev; 1974 Feb; 47(2):237-356. PubMed ID: 11660869
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The administration of psychotropic drugs to prisoners: state of the law and beyond.
    Floyd J
    Calif Law Rev; 1990 Oct; 78(5):1243-85. PubMed ID: 11659407
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The coerced use of Ritalin for behavior control in public schools: legal challenges.
    Jackson JE
    Clgh Rev; 1976 Jul; 10(3):181-93. PubMed ID: 11664661
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Madness and medicine: the forcible administration of psychotropic drugs.
    Beyer S
    Wis L Rev; 1980; 1980(3):497-567. PubMed ID: 11665228
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Advances in mental health: a case for the right to refuse treatment.
    Levick M; Wapner A
    Temple Law Q; 1975; 48(2):354-83. PubMed ID: 11664437
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. kaimowitz v. Department of Mental Health: a right to be free from experimental psychosurgery?
    Mason JR
    Boston Univ Law Rev; 1974 Mar; 54(2):301-39. PubMed ID: 11661088
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. On autonomy: legal and psychological perspectives.
    Winick BJ
    Villanova Law Rev; 1992; 37(6):1705-77. PubMed ID: 11654414
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The right to refuse mental health treatment: a First Amendment perspective.
    Winick BJ
    Univ Miami Law Rev; 1989 Sep; 44(1):1-103. PubMed ID: 11659280
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Legal regulation of applied behavior analysis in mental institutions and prisons.
    Friedman PR
    Ariz Law Rev; 1975; 17(1):39-104. PubMed ID: 11661217
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prisoner medical refusals: a response for New Jersey.
    Walker K
    Rutgers Law J; 1984; 16(1):117-64. PubMed ID: 11649877
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Compulsory medical treatment of adults.
    Riga PJ
    Cathol Lawyer; 1976; 22(2):105-37. PubMed ID: 11664685
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Population policy making: reproductive freedom and the "compelling" state interest.
    Yates KA
    UMKC Law Rev; 1973; 42(2):201-17. PubMed ID: 11661099
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The constitutionality of court-ordered cesarean surgery: a threshold question.
    Levine EM
    Albany Law J Sci Technol; 1994; 4(2):229-309. PubMed ID: 12091921
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Court-ordered cesareans: a growing concern for indigent women.
    Daniels JA
    Clgh Rev; 1988 Feb; 21(9):1064-71. PubMed ID: 11649972
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Forced drugging.
    Marshall E
    New Repub; 1978 Aug-2 Sep 26; 179(9-10):13-5. PubMed ID: 11665036
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The privacy implications of Professor Anderson's proposed mandatory registry for bone marrow donation: a reply.
    Hartman RG
    Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1993; 54(2):531-51. PubMed ID: 11656304
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.