245 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11663407)
1. Whose right to life? Implications of Roe v. Wade.
Cane MB
Fam Law Q; 1973; 7(4):413-32. PubMed ID: 11663407
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The abortion cases: a study in law and social change.
Rubin ER
North Carol Centr Law J; 1974; 5(2):215-53. PubMed ID: 11663476
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The forest and the trees: Roe v. Wade and its critics.
Heymann PB; Barzelay DE
Boston Univ Law Rev; 1973 Jul; 53(4):765-84. PubMed ID: 11663362
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Roe v. Wade and the traditional legal standards concerning pregnancy.
Hopkin WR
Temple Law Q; 1974; 47(4):715-38. PubMed ID: 11664349
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Roe! Doe! Where are you?: the effect of the Supreme Court's abortion decisions.
Satris MJ
Univ Calif Davis Law Rev; 1974; 7():432-56. PubMed ID: 11661108
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Roe v. Wade: its impact on rights of choice in human reproduction.
Patton DE
Columbia Human Rights Law Rev; 1973; 5(2):497-521. PubMed ID: 11663415
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The landmark abortion decisions: justifiable termination or miscarriage of justice?--proposals for legislative response.
Scotland AG
Pac Law J; 1973 Jul; 4(2):821-60. PubMed ID: 11663368
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Webster v. Reproductive Health Services: devaluing the right to choose.
Binion G
Women Polit; 1991; 11(2):41-60. PubMed ID: 11656100
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Abortion: rights or technicalities? A comparison of Roe v. Wade with the abortion decision of the German Federal Constitutional Court.
Brown HO
Hum Life Rev; 1975; 1(3):60-74. PubMed ID: 11662181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The right to abortion: expansion of the right to privacy through the Fourteenth Amendment.
Goldenberg D
Cathol Lawyer; 1973; 19(1):36-57. PubMed ID: 11663414
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The putative father's rights after Roe v. Wade.
Tapovatz WE
St Marys Law J; 1974; 6(2):407-20. PubMed ID: 11663502
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Roe v. Wade--the abortion decision--an analysis and its implications.
Riggs T
San Diego Law Rev; 1973 Jun; 10(4):844-56. PubMed ID: 11661026
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Trimesters and technology: revamping Roe v. Wade.
Rhoden NK
Yale Law J; 1986 Mar; 95(4):639-97. PubMed ID: 11655828
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Doctors, patients and the Constitution: a theoretical analysis of the physician's role in "private" reproductive decisions.
Appleton SF
Wash Univ Law Q; 1985; 63(2):183-236. PubMed ID: 11656658
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Haunting shadows from the rubble of Roe's right of privacy.
Haley JN
Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1974; 9(1):145-84. PubMed ID: 11664401
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Overruling Roe v. Wade: an analysis of the proposed Constitutional amendments.
Rice CE
Boston Coll Ind Commer Law Rev; 1973 Dec; 15(2):307-41. PubMed ID: 11663416
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Rethinking Roe v. Wade.
Wardle LD
Brigh Young Univ Law Rev; 1985; 1985(2):231-64. PubMed ID: 11655792
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Oh my God, I'm pregnant.
Minter CV
Ohio North Univ Law Rev; 1973; 1(1):119-29. PubMed ID: 11663469
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Roe v. Wade and Doe v. Bolton: the compelling state interest test in substantive due process.
Gelinas A
Wash Lee Law Rev; 1973; 30(3):628-46. PubMed ID: 11663508
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Abortion and the Constitution: the need for a life-protective amendment.
Destro RA
Calif Law Rev; 1975 Sep; 63(5):1250-351. PubMed ID: 11663611
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
