These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
24. The husband's rights in abortion. Etzioni A Trial; 1976 Nov; 12(11):56-8. PubMed ID: 11664680 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. The right of privacy and restraints on abortion under the "undue burden" test: a jurisprudential comparison of Planned Parenthood v. Casey with European practice and Italian law. Ross CS Indiana Int Comp Law Rev; 1993; 3():199-231. PubMed ID: 12091926 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Constitutional law--minor's right of privacy--state may require third-party consent for a minor's abortion. Barrasso JY Tulane Law Rev; 1979 Dec; 54(1):233-43. PubMed ID: 11664077 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Roe v. Wade and the traditional legal standards concerning pregnancy. Hopkin WR Temple Law Q; 1974; 47(4):715-38. PubMed ID: 11664349 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. The legal impact of the Roe and Doe decisions. Granfield D Jurist; 1973; 33(2):113-22. PubMed ID: 11663427 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. The putative father's rights after Roe v. Wade. Tapovatz WE St Marys Law J; 1974; 6(2):407-20. PubMed ID: 11663502 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Oh my God, I'm pregnant. Minter CV Ohio North Univ Law Rev; 1973; 1(1):119-29. PubMed ID: 11663469 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Abortion and judicial review: of burdens and benefits, hard cases and some bad law. Bennett RW Northwest Univ Law Rev; 1981 Feb; 75(6):978-1017. PubMed ID: 11655428 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Constitutional law: denial of state funding of non-therapeutic abortions to indigent women. Harrison TH Stetson Law Rev; 1978; 8(1):247-58. PubMed ID: 11663966 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Constitutional law--Supreme Court is undecided on parental notification requirement for minor's abortion. McArthur JR S C Law Rev; 1980 Feb; 31(3):604-16. PubMed ID: 11665169 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Let them eat cake. Annas GJ Hastings Cent Rep; 1977 Aug; 7(4):8-9. PubMed ID: 330463 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The Supreme Court 1972 term. Foreward: toward a model of roles in the due process of life and law. Tribe LH Harv Law Rev; 1973 Nov; 87(1):1-53. PubMed ID: 11663596 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Maternal duties during pregnancy: toward a conceptual framework. Sterns ML New Engl Law Rev; 1985-1986; 21(3):595-634. PubMed ID: 16998992 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. A matter of life and death: pregnancy clauses in living will statutes. Dyke MC Boston Univ Law Rev; 1990 Nov; 70(5):867-87. PubMed ID: 12186075 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Right to life of the unborn. Garn Je Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1981 Jan; 127(12):S567-78. PubMed ID: 11665256 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. The father's rights in the abortion decision. Schultz WL Tex Tech Law Rev; 1975; 6(3):1075-94. PubMed ID: 11664508 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. From arguments to Supreme Court opinions in Planned Parenthood v. Casey. Kassop N PS (Wash DC); 1993 Mar; 26(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 12085874 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]