338 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11663427)
1. The legal impact of the Roe and Doe decisions.
Granfield D
Jurist; 1973; 33(2):113-22. PubMed ID: 11663427
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Roe! Doe! Where are you?: the effect of the Supreme Court's abortion decisions.
Satris MJ
Univ Calif Davis Law Rev; 1974; 7():432-56. PubMed ID: 11661108
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Enforcement of state abortion statutes after Roe: a state-by-state analysis.
Linton PB
Univ Detroit Law Rev; 1990; 67(2):157-259. PubMed ID: 11659261
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Roe v. Wade and the traditional legal standards concerning pregnancy.
Hopkin WR
Temple Law Q; 1974; 47(4):715-38. PubMed ID: 11664349
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Prenatal caretaking: limits of state intervention with and without Roe.
Rush SE
Univ Fla Law Rev; 1987; 39(1):55-112. PubMed ID: 11658954
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. S.J. Res. 110: Human Life Federalism Amendment.
Hatch OG
Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1981 Sep; 127(131):S10194-8. PubMed ID: 11658572
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Medical responsibility for fetal survival under Roe and Doe.
Sendor BB
Harv Civ Rights-Civil Lib Law Rev; 1975; 10(2):444-71. PubMed ID: 11663614
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Current technology affecting Supreme Court abortion jurisprudence.
Buckley M
NY Law Sch Law Rev; 1982; 27(4):1221-60. PubMed ID: 11651778
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The trimester approach: how long can the legal fiction last?
Casurella JG; Schrock CT
Mercer Law Rev; 1984; 35(4):891-913. PubMed ID: 11658750
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Pregnant women's rights and the legal impact of theories of when life begins.
Crepps J; Miller A
Am J Ethics Med; 1994; 3(1):28-9. PubMed ID: 11652827
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Webster v. Reproductive Health Services: a path to constitutional equalibrium.
Chopko ME
Campbell Law Rev; 1990; 12(2):181-220. PubMed ID: 11656527
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Rethinking Roe v. Wade.
Wardle LD
Brigh Young Univ Law Rev; 1985; 1985(2):231-64. PubMed ID: 11655792
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Survey of abortion law.
Platt JG; O'Malley K
Ariz State Law J; 1980; 1980(1):67-216. PubMed ID: 11655392
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Roe to Casey: a survey of abortion law.
Pirner RK; Williams LB
Washburn Law J; 1993; 32(2):166-89. PubMed ID: 11659798
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Beyond the Roe debate: judicial experience with the 1980's "reasonableness" test.
Farber DA; Nowak JE
Va Law Rev; 1990 Apr; 76(3):519-38. PubMed ID: 11659370
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Recent developments in the abortion area.
Scanlan AL
Cathol Lawyer; 1975; 21(4):315-21. PubMed ID: 11661372
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The Webster amicus curiae briefs: perspectives on the abortion controversy and the role of the Supreme Court -- amici for appellants.
Blaustein AP
Am J Law Med; 1989; 15(2-3):204-33. PubMed ID: 11644397
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Criminal liability of physicians: an encroachment on the abortion right?
Barber RA
Am Crim Law Rev; 1981; 18(4):591-615. PubMed ID: 11655468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. High court asks sharp questions in abortion case.
Greenhouse L
N Y Times Web; 1989 Apr; ():A1, B14. PubMed ID: 11646764
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The new pro-life legislation: patterns and recommendations.
Witherspoon JP
St Marys Law J; 1976; 7(4):637-97. PubMed ID: 11664635
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
