These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

326 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11663427)

  • 41. State regulation of late abortion and the physician's duty of care to the viable fetus.
    Wood MA; Hawkins LB
    Miss Law Rev; 1980; 45(3):394-422. PubMed ID: 11664113
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. The abortion cases.
    Rust ME
    ABA J; 1986 Feb; 72():50-3. PubMed ID: 11655726
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. The Supreme Court 1972 term. Foreward: toward a model of roles in the due process of life and law.
    Tribe LH
    Harv Law Rev; 1973 Nov; 87(1):1-53. PubMed ID: 11663596
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Abortion: are medicine and the law on a collision course?
    Pollner F
    Med World News; 1985 Jul; 26(13):66-68, 70, 73+. PubMed ID: 11645557
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Abortion 1984: the controversy continues.
    Healey JM
    Conn Med; 1984 Apr; 48(4):269. PubMed ID: 11644128
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The aftermath of Casey: is a sonogram requirement unduly burdensome?
    Trense CF
    Law Psychol Rev; 1993; 17():225-41. PubMed ID: 11659925
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Why Roe v. Wade should be overruled.
    Loewy AH
    North Carol Law Rev; 1989 Apr; 67(4):939-48. PubMed ID: 11655982
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Webster and the future of substantive due process.
    Bopp J; Coleson RE
    Duquesne Law Rev; 1990; 28(2):271-94. PubMed ID: 11656037
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. The abortion decision and evolving limits on state intervention.
    MacDougal D; Nasser WP
    Haw Bar J; 1975; 11():51-72. PubMed ID: 11664576
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. The forest and the trees: Roe v. Wade and its critics.
    Heymann PB; Barzelay DE
    Boston Univ Law Rev; 1973 Jul; 53(4):765-84. PubMed ID: 11663362
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Abortion: state action.
    Womens Rights Law Report; 1977; 3(3-4):162-9. PubMed ID: 11663757
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Burying the dead: the case against revival of pre-Roe and pre-Casey abortion statutes in a post-Casey world.
    Scott TL
    Rev Law Soc Change; 1991-1992; 19(2):355-89. PubMed ID: 11656256
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. The center holds!
    Dworkin R
    New York Rev Books; 1992 Aug; 39(14):29-33. PubMed ID: 11656267
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Closing the circle of constitutional review from Griswold v. Connecticut to Roe v. Wade: an outline of a decision merely overruling Roe.
    Van Alstyne W
    Duke Law J; 1989 Dec; 1989(6):1677-88. PubMed ID: 11656009
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Doe v. Bridgeton Hospital Association, Inc. 7 Oct 1974.
    New Jersey. Superior Court, Law Division
    Atl Report; 1974; 327():448-62. PubMed ID: 11645992
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Hospitalization requirements for second trimester abortions: for the purpose of health or hindrance?
    Foley MC
    Georgetown Law J; 1983 Feb; 71(3):991-1021. PubMed ID: 11655620
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Legal abortion under fierce attack 15 years after Roe v. Wade ruling.
    Lewin T
    N Y Times Web; 1988 May; ():A20. PubMed ID: 11647387
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. The constitutionality of the Freedom of Choice Act of 1993.
    Axel DA
    Hastings Law J; 1994; 45(3):641-65. PubMed ID: 11656418
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. The law of choice and choice of law: abortion, the right to travel, and extraterritorial regulation in American federalism.
    Kreimer SF
    N Y Univ Law Rev; 1992 Jun; 67(3):451-519. PubMed ID: 11656241
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Does the state action doctrine compel nominally private hospitals to make abortion services available despite "conscience clauses".
    Shuger NB
    Md Law Forum; 1974; 4(3):113-24. PubMed ID: 11663479
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.