174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11663428)
1. A constitutional lawyer looks at the Roe-Doe decisions.
Broderick A
Jurist; 1973; 33(2):123-33. PubMed ID: 11663428
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Overruling Roe v. Wade: an analysis of the proposed Constitutional amendments.
Rice CE
Boston Coll Ind Commer Law Rev; 1973 Dec; 15(2):307-41. PubMed ID: 11663416
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Roe v. Wade and the traditional legal standards concerning pregnancy.
Hopkin WR
Temple Law Q; 1974; 47(4):715-38. PubMed ID: 11664349
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. On a constitutional amendment protecting unborn human life.
United States Catholic Conference
Cathol Mind; 1974 Oct; 72(1286):43-64. PubMed ID: 11661138
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Brain birth: a proposal for defining when a fetus is entitled to human life status.
Gertler GB
South Calif Law Rev; 1986 Jul; 59(5):1061-78. PubMed ID: 11655850
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Introduction of S.J. Res. 140 and S.J. Res. 141.
Buckley J
Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1975 Oct; 121(153):S18193-214. PubMed ID: 11663650
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Reexamining Roe: nineteenth-century abortion statutes and the Fourteenth Amendment.
Witherspoon JS
St Marys Law J; 1985; 17(1):29-71. PubMed ID: 11655872
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The Supreme Court 1972 term. Foreward: toward a model of roles in the due process of life and law.
Tribe LH
Harv Law Rev; 1973 Nov; 87(1):1-53. PubMed ID: 11663596
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The Human Life Bill: personhood revisited, or Congress takes aim at Roe v. Wade.
Ferreira JG
Hofstra Law Rev; 1982; 10(4):1269-95. PubMed ID: 11655632
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Homo sapienism: critique of Roe v. Wade and abortion.
Lewis JL
Albany Law Rev; 1975; 39(4):856-93. PubMed ID: 11661205
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Abortion and the Constitution: the need for a life-protective amendment.
Destro RA
Calif Law Rev; 1975 Sep; 63(5):1250-351. PubMed ID: 11663611
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Prenatal caretaking: limits of state intervention with and without Roe.
Rush SE
Univ Fla Law Rev; 1987; 39(1):55-112. PubMed ID: 11658954
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The "right" to an abortion, the scope of Fourteenth Amendment "personhood," and the Supreme Court's birth requirement.
Gorby JD
South Ill Univ Law J; 1979; 1979(1):1-36. PubMed ID: 12083082
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Viability and fetal life in state criminal abortion laws.
Griffin E
J Crim Law Criminol; 1981; 72(1):324-44. PubMed ID: 11650713
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Protection of the unborn--introduction of a joint resolution.
Buckley JL
Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1973 May; 119(82):S9973-92. PubMed ID: 11663377
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Death of an unborn child: jurisprudential inconsistencies in wrongful death, criminal homicide, and abortion cases.
Klasing MS
Pepperdine Law Rev; 1995; 22(3):933-79. PubMed ID: 11660413
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Abortion: history, opinions, and what's new in the United States.
Jubb ED
Can Bar J; 1973 Jul; 4(3):8-12. PubMed ID: 11663761
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Senate Joint Resolution 10 and Senate Joint Resolution 11--right to life amendments.
Buckley J
Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1975 Jan; 121(7):S651-72. PubMed ID: 11663644
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Torts--wrongful death--a viable fetus is a "person" under the New Mexico wrongful death statute: Salazar v. St. Vincent Hospital.
Donahue SL
N M Law Rev; 1982; 12(2):843-59. PubMed ID: 11658657
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The landmark abortion decisions: justifiable termination or miscarriage of justice?--proposals for legislative response.
Scotland AG
Pac Law J; 1973 Jul; 4(2):821-60. PubMed ID: 11663368
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
