These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11663442)
1. Protecting the unborn. Ramsey P Commonweal; 1974 May; 100(13):308-14. PubMed ID: 11663442 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Oh my God, I'm pregnant. Minter CV Ohio North Univ Law Rev; 1973; 1(1):119-29. PubMed ID: 11663469 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Can Congress create people? Buckley WF; Galebach SH; Bork R; Pilpel H Hum Life Rev; 1981; 7(3):87-108. PubMed ID: 11655601 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The Supreme Court 1972 term. Foreward: toward a model of roles in the due process of life and law. Tribe LH Harv Law Rev; 1973 Nov; 87(1):1-53. PubMed ID: 11663596 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. A human life statute. Galebach SH Hum Life Rev; 1981; 7(1):5-33. PubMed ID: 11651719 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Roe v. Wade and the traditional legal standards concerning pregnancy. Hopkin WR Temple Law Q; 1974; 47(4):715-38. PubMed ID: 11664349 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The Human Life Federalism Amendment: an assessment. Caron WR Cathol Lawyer; 1982; 27(2):87-111. PubMed ID: 11655614 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The new pro-life legislation: patterns and recommendations. Witherspoon JP St Marys Law J; 1976; 7(4):637-97. PubMed ID: 11664635 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. To be or not to be: protecting the unborn's potentiality of life. Parness JA; Pritchard SK Univ Cincinnati Law Rev; 1982; 51(2):257-98. PubMed ID: 11658559 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Abortion and the Constitution: the need for a life-protective amendment. Destro RA Calif Law Rev; 1975 Sep; 63(5):1250-351. PubMed ID: 11663611 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. A decision-theoretic reconstruction of Roe v. Wade. Lockhart T Public Aff Q; 1991 Jul; 5(3):243-58. PubMed ID: 11656064 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Protection of the unborn--introduction of a joint resolution. Buckley JL Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1973 May; 119(82):S9973-92. PubMed ID: 11663377 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The landmark abortion decisions: justifiable termination or miscarriage of justice?--proposals for legislative response. Scotland AG Pac Law J; 1973 Jul; 4(2):821-60. PubMed ID: 11663368 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The legal status of the unborn after Webster. Parness JA Dickinson Law Rev; 1990; 95(1):1-22. PubMed ID: 11659394 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Reexamining Roe: nineteenth-century abortion statutes and the Fourteenth Amendment. Witherspoon JS St Marys Law J; 1985; 17(1):29-71. PubMed ID: 11655872 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Overruling Roe v. Wade: an analysis of the proposed Constitutional amendments. Rice CE Boston Coll Ind Commer Law Rev; 1973 Dec; 15(2):307-41. PubMed ID: 11663416 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Criminal law--Texas Abortion Statute...violates due process clause of Fourteenth Amendment protecting right to privacy. Beaty MA Am J Crim Law; 1973; 2(2):231-43. PubMed ID: 11663506 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Proposed amendment to Constitution guaranteeing the right of life to unborn. Helms J Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1976 Mar; 122(36):S3369-71. PubMed ID: 11663665 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. A human life amendment. Helms J Hum Life Rev; 1977; 3(2):7-42. PubMed ID: 11663729 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The constitutional validity of abortion legislation: a comparative note. Glenn HP McGill Law J; 1975; 21(4):673-84. PubMed ID: 11663622 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]