These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11663483)
1. Validity, under Federal Constitution, of abortion laws. Shapiro SR US Supreme Court Rep; 1974; 35():735-69. PubMed ID: 11663483 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Protecting "pregnant persons": women's equality and reproductive freedom. Ellis DA Const Law J; 1996; 6():967-77. PubMed ID: 11657887 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Roe v. Wade: its impact on rights of choice in human reproduction. Patton DE Columbia Human Rights Law Rev; 1973; 5(2):497-521. PubMed ID: 11663415 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Abortion compromise -- inevitable and impossible. Law SA Univ Ill Law Rev; 1992; 25(4):921-41. PubMed ID: 11656296 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Where privacy fails: equal protection and the abortion rights of minors. Schmidt CG N Y Univ Law Rev; 1993 Jun; 68(3):597-638. PubMed ID: 11659822 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Abortion and the consideration of fundamental, irreconcilable interests. Jones CJ Syracuse Law Rev; 1982; 33(2):565-613. PubMed ID: 11658668 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Losing the negative right of privacy: building sexual and reproductive freedom. Copelon R Rev Law Soc Change; 1990-1991; 18(1):15-50. PubMed ID: 11656169 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Abortion in the common law world. Veitch E; Tracey R Am J Comp Law; 1974; 12(4):652-96. PubMed ID: 11663456 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The Supreme Court on abortion funding: the second time around. Horan DJ; Marzen TJ St Louis Univ Law J; 1981; 25(2):411-27. PubMed ID: 11655812 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Envisioning a future for reproductive liberty: strategies for making the rights real. Pine RN; Law SA Harv Civ Rights-Civil Lib Law Rev; 1992; 27(2):407-63. PubMed ID: 11656200 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The invalidity of Canada's abortion law--section 251 of the Criminal Code. Picher PC Crim Rep Can New Ser; 1974; 24():1-31. PubMed ID: 11663529 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Abortion and the Constitution: the need for a life-protective amendment. Destro RA Calif Law Rev; 1975 Sep; 63(5):1250-351. PubMed ID: 11663611 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. From spiritual descriptions to legal prescriptions: religious imagery of women as "fetal container" in the law. Peach LJ J Law Relig; 1993-1994; 10(1):73-93. PubMed ID: 11656314 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Privacy and abortion rights under the Louisiana state constitution: could Roe v. Wade be alive and well in the Bayou state? Devlin J LA Law Rev; 1991 Mar; 51(4):685-732. PubMed ID: 11656097 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Committee to Defend Reproductive Rights v. Myers: procreative choice guaranteed for all women. Erca A Gold Gate Univ Law Rev; 1982; 12(3):691-716. PubMed ID: 11655619 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Abortion: the five-year revolution and its impact. Conger J Ecol Law Q; 1973; 3(2):311-47. PubMed ID: 11663390 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. "Keep your laws off my body": abortion regulation and the takings clause. Looper-Friedman SE New Engl Law Rev; 1995; 29(2):253-84. PubMed ID: 11656525 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Doe and Roe: where do we go from here? Goodman J; Schoenbrod RC; Stearns N Womens Rights Law Report; 1973; 1(4):20-38. PubMed ID: 11663391 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Abortion rights in America. Bullock JR Brigh Young Univ Law Rev; 1994; 1994(1):63-94. PubMed ID: 11656488 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]