241 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11663483)
1. Validity, under Federal Constitution, of abortion laws.
Shapiro SR
US Supreme Court Rep; 1974; 35():735-69. PubMed ID: 11663483
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Abortion and liberalized abortion laws.
Hogan Le
Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1973 Jul; 119(111):H6121-32. PubMed ID: 11663405
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Protecting "pregnant persons": women's equality and reproductive freedom.
Ellis DA
Const Law J; 1996; 6():967-77. PubMed ID: 11657887
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Roe v. Wade: its impact on rights of choice in human reproduction.
Patton DE
Columbia Human Rights Law Rev; 1973; 5(2):497-521. PubMed ID: 11663415
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Abortion compromise -- inevitable and impossible.
Law SA
Univ Ill Law Rev; 1992; 25(4):921-41. PubMed ID: 11656296
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Where privacy fails: equal protection and the abortion rights of minors.
Schmidt CG
N Y Univ Law Rev; 1993 Jun; 68(3):597-638. PubMed ID: 11659822
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Abortion and the consideration of fundamental, irreconcilable interests.
Jones CJ
Syracuse Law Rev; 1982; 33(2):565-613. PubMed ID: 11658668
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Losing the negative right of privacy: building sexual and reproductive freedom.
Copelon R
Rev Law Soc Change; 1990-1991; 18(1):15-50. PubMed ID: 11656169
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Abortion in the common law world.
Veitch E; Tracey R
Am J Comp Law; 1974; 12(4):652-96. PubMed ID: 11663456
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The Supreme Court on abortion funding: the second time around.
Horan DJ; Marzen TJ
St Louis Univ Law J; 1981; 25(2):411-27. PubMed ID: 11655812
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Envisioning a future for reproductive liberty: strategies for making the rights real.
Pine RN; Law SA
Harv Civ Rights-Civil Lib Law Rev; 1992; 27(2):407-63. PubMed ID: 11656200
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The invalidity of Canada's abortion law--section 251 of the Criminal Code.
Picher PC
Crim Rep Can New Ser; 1974; 24():1-31. PubMed ID: 11663529
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Abortion and the Constitution: the need for a life-protective amendment.
Destro RA
Calif Law Rev; 1975 Sep; 63(5):1250-351. PubMed ID: 11663611
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. From spiritual descriptions to legal prescriptions: religious imagery of women as "fetal container" in the law.
Peach LJ
J Law Relig; 1993-1994; 10(1):73-93. PubMed ID: 11656314
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Privacy and abortion rights under the Louisiana state constitution: could Roe v. Wade be alive and well in the Bayou state?
Devlin J
LA Law Rev; 1991 Mar; 51(4):685-732. PubMed ID: 11656097
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Committee to Defend Reproductive Rights v. Myers: procreative choice guaranteed for all women.
Erca A
Gold Gate Univ Law Rev; 1982; 12(3):691-716. PubMed ID: 11655619
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Abortion: the five-year revolution and its impact.
Conger J
Ecol Law Q; 1973; 3(2):311-47. PubMed ID: 11663390
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. "Keep your laws off my body": abortion regulation and the takings clause.
Looper-Friedman SE
New Engl Law Rev; 1995; 29(2):253-84. PubMed ID: 11656525
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Doe and Roe: where do we go from here?
Goodman J; Schoenbrod RC; Stearns N
Womens Rights Law Report; 1973; 1(4):20-38. PubMed ID: 11663391
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Abortion rights in America.
Bullock JR
Brigh Young Univ Law Rev; 1994; 1994(1):63-94. PubMed ID: 11656488
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
