563 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11663529)
1. The invalidity of Canada's abortion law--section 251 of the Criminal Code.
Picher PC
Crim Rep Can New Ser; 1974; 24():1-31. PubMed ID: 11663529
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Survey of abortion law.
Platt JG; O'Malley K
Ariz State Law J; 1980; 1980(1):67-216. PubMed ID: 11655392
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The Supreme Court on abortion funding: the second time around.
Horan DJ; Marzen TJ
St Louis Univ Law J; 1981; 25(2):411-27. PubMed ID: 11655812
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Oh my God, I'm pregnant.
Minter CV
Ohio North Univ Law Rev; 1973; 1(1):119-29. PubMed ID: 11663469
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The Human Life Federalism Amendment: an assessment.
Caron WR
Cathol Lawyer; 1982; 27(2):87-111. PubMed ID: 11655614
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The new pro-life legislation: patterns and recommendations.
Witherspoon JP
St Marys Law J; 1976; 7(4):637-97. PubMed ID: 11664635
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Can Congress create people?
Buckley WF; Galebach SH; Bork R; Pilpel H
Hum Life Rev; 1981; 7(3):87-108. PubMed ID: 11655601
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Constitutional law--substantive due process--abortion--reasonable statutory recordkeeping and reporting requirements upheld.
Brigh Young Univ Law Rev; 1976; 1976(4):977-99. PubMed ID: 11664779
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Roe v. Wade and the traditional legal standards concerning pregnancy.
Hopkin WR
Temple Law Q; 1974; 47(4):715-38. PubMed ID: 11664349
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Testimony opposing "Freedom of Choice Act.
Alvare H;
Origins; 1992 Apr; 21(43):692-6. PubMed ID: 11656134
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Rethinking Roe v. Wade.
Wardle LD
Brigh Young Univ Law Rev; 1985; 1985(2):231-64. PubMed ID: 11655792
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The Supreme Court 1972 term. Foreward: toward a model of roles in the due process of life and law.
Tribe LH
Harv Law Rev; 1973 Nov; 87(1):1-53. PubMed ID: 11663596
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. What the Court giveth: abortion and Bill C-43.
Noonan SM
Queens Law J; 1991; 16():321-45. PubMed ID: 11656415
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Criminal law--Texas Abortion Statute...violates due process clause of Fourteenth Amendment protecting right to privacy.
Beaty MA
Am J Crim Law; 1973; 2(2):231-43. PubMed ID: 11663506
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Abortion and the law in 1980.
Paul EW; Schaap P
NY Law Sch Law Rev; 1980; 25(3):497-525. PubMed ID: 11664083
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The legal status of the unborn after Webster.
Parness JA
Dickinson Law Rev; 1990; 95(1):1-22. PubMed ID: 11659394
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Abortion laws, religious beliefs and the first amendment.
Skahn SL
Valparaiso Univ Law Rev; 1980; 14(3):487-526. PubMed ID: 11664174
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Medical responsibility for fetal survival under Roe and Doe.
Sendor BB
Harv Civ Rights-Civil Lib Law Rev; 1975; 10(2):444-71. PubMed ID: 11663614
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Webster, privacy, and RU486.
Haas EM
J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1990; 6():277-96. PubMed ID: 11645679
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The constitutional validity of abortion legislation: a comparative note.
Glenn HP
McGill Law J; 1975; 21(4):673-84. PubMed ID: 11663622
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
