These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Abortion, conscience and the Constitution: an examination of federal institutional conscience clauses. Pilpel HF; Patton DE Columbia Human Rights Law Rev; 1974 Fall-1975 Winter; 6(2):279-305. PubMed ID: 11663597 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Does the state action doctrine compel nominally private hospitals to make abortion services available despite "conscience clauses". Shuger NB Md Law Forum; 1974; 4(3):113-24. PubMed ID: 11663479 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Constitutional law--abortion--private hospital may refuse to perform abortion. Berger B St Louis Univ Law J; 1974; 18(3):440-60. PubMed ID: 11663525 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The Michigan Abortion Refusal Act. White GM Univ Mich J Law Reform; 1975; 8(3):659-75. PubMed ID: 11663576 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Section 401(b) of the Health Programs Extension Act: an abortive attempt by Congress to resolve a constitutional dilemma. William Mary Law Rev; 1975; 17(2):303-31. PubMed ID: 11663679 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Hill-Burton hospitals after Roe and Doe: can federally funded hospitals refuse to perform abortions? Berl EL Rev Law Soc Change; 1974; 4(1):83-97. PubMed ID: 11663526 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Hospitals--a current analysis of the right to abortions and sterilizations in the Fourth Circuit: state action and the Church Amendment. Malpass S North Carol Law Rev; 1976 Sep; 54(6):1307-16. PubMed ID: 11663711 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Abortion: state action. Womens Rights Law Report; 1977; 3(3-4):162-9. PubMed ID: 11663757 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Submission of an amendment to H.R. 3153, the Social Security Amendments of 1973. Church F Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1973 Nov; 119(176):S20433-5. PubMed ID: 11663385 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. State limitations upon the availability and accessibility of abortions after Wade and Bolton. Finn J Univ Kans Law Rev; 1976; 25(1):87-107. PubMed ID: 11663734 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Doe v. Bridgeton Hospital Association, Inc. 7 Oct 1974. New Jersey. Superior Court, Law Division Atl Report; 1974; 327():448-62. PubMed ID: 11645992 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Implications of the abortion decisions: post Roe and Doe litigation and legislation. Wasserman R Columbia Law Rev; 1974 Mar; 74(2):237-68. PubMed ID: 11664412 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The position of physician and hospital in abortion picture. Zaslow J Trial; 1973; 9(6):61-2. PubMed ID: 11662034 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Public Health Service Act Extension of 1973. Javits JK Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1973 Mar; 119(47):S5720-6. PubMed ID: 11663406 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Accommodation of conscientious objection to abortion: a case study of the nursing profession. Durham WC; Wood MA; Condie SJ Brigh Young Univ Law Rev; 1982; 1982(2):253-370. PubMed ID: 11655680 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Recent developments in the abortion area. Scanlan AL Cathol Lawyer; 1975; 21(4):315-21. PubMed ID: 11661372 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The law of fertility regulation in the United States: a 1980 review. Isaacs SL J Fam Law; 1980-1981; 19(1):65-96. PubMed ID: 11663114 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]